Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 3763706 :: october 2008 :: RMTnews
14
RMT had a busy TUC this year,
winning important debates and
resolutions on trade union
rights, privatisation, against the
Lisbon Treaty and for more
democracy at Congress itself.
The union led the way with a
successful motion calling for
local trades councils to receive
the right to submit a motion to
Congress - in line with rights
already enjoyed by the TUC's
equality conferences.
General secretary Bob Crow
pointed out that this right was
already in place at the Wales
and Scottish TUC conferences.
He said that trades councils’
voices should be heard at
Congress because democracy
and debate could only be
improved by the addition of
more voices of ordinary trade
unionists, "rather than general
secretaries talking to general
secretaries."
Opponents of the proposal
claimed that it would allow
trades councils, dominated by
"white, middle-aged men" to
circumvent their own unions
and force their own agenda on
to the order paper at Congress.
Bob responded that this
picture did not correspond to
the trades councils he knew -
and pointed out that it would be
futile to try and circumvent
union policy at the TUC because
the single motion permitted at
Congress would simply be voted
down.
FOR TRADE UNION RIGHTS
RMT made a successful call for
the repeal of the anti-union
laws and the annulment of
recent European Court of Justice
rulings outlawing strike action.
Delegates overwhelmingly
backed a call for Europe-wide
protests and a lobby of
Parliament against these
fundamental attacks on
collective bargaining and the
right to strike.
The motion pointed out that
the Lisbon Treaty would
exacerbate attacks on trade
union rights by handing the
misnamed court huge new
powers.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that recent ECJ
rulings in the Viking, Laval,
Ruffert and Luxembourg cases
sought to turn the clock back by
undermining trade union rights
in various ways.
"These ECJ rulings constitute
a Taff Vale judgment for the
21st century. The supposed
crime of the Associated Society
of Railway Servants back in
1901 was to be "in restraint of
trade" by calling strike action,"
he said.
Bob warned delegates that if
the discredited treaty was
imposed trade union rights
would be under further attack in
the name of the 'free movement
of goods, services and labour’
within the EU.
Unison delegate Bob Oram
also cited recent ECJ cases as
one of the main reasons why
Irish workers voted against the
Lisbon Treaty.
In 2005 Congress delegates
voted overwhelmingly to oppose
the EU constitution and, last
year, Congress demanded a
referendum on the renamed
constitution the Lisbon Treaty.
Bob warned that "unless we
roll back these ECJ rulings we
will be left defenceless against
the EU's drive to liberalise
markets and institutionalise
social dumping.
"That means stepping up the
campaign for a Trade Union
Freedom Act and working with
unions across Europe to demand
an end to anti-union ECJ
rulings," he said.
END PROFITEERING
Angry trade unionists
denounced new Labour for
refusing to rein in the "obscene"
greed of the energy privateers.
Congress condemned the
rapacious energy companies for
raking in super-profits while the
poor and elderly were forced to
decide "between heating and
eating" this winter.
Delegates demanded a
windfall tax on the privateers,
as a prelude to ending the
toothless "regulation" of Ofgem
and restoring the utilities to
public ownership.
RMT president John Leach
stressed that "public ownership
of the utilities would be
welcomed by working people
and would allow the
government the strategic control
it needs to end fuel poverty".
RENATIONALISE RAIL
Congress backed a composite
motion on rail transport which
condemned the massive fare
increases and called for a
publicly-owned and accountable
railway and far greater use to be
made of rail freight
Delegates from ASLEF and
TSSA warned that this showed
the utter failure of a privatised
transport network, “where profit
takes precedence over
investment” and warned that the
government's failure to address
the underlying problems of
ownership and fragmentation
prevented rail from “fulfilling its
full social, economic and
environmental potential”.
Congress called on the
government to require train
operating companies to make
their cheapest advertised fares
which more openly and easily
available, as well as calling for
an extension of free
SETTING THE
AGENDA AT TUC