Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: may 2013 :: RMTnews
9
With Mrs Thatcher’s £10 million tax funded
funeral barely behind us, this Thatcherite
dominated coalition government is now
showing their true colours, pursuing rail
privatisation regardless of the public
interest.
The Secretary of State for Transport’s recent
announcement to start a tendering process
for the East Coast Mainline, and 9 further
franchises, will not be in the public interest
and will result in the return of rail operators
to private hands within the next two years: a
recipe for disaster.
Following the rescue of the East Coast line
by The Department for Transport from the
failing £1.4bn National Express franchise in
2009, the overnment are again recklessly
returning to a foolish policy of privatisation,
despite history repeatedly telling us that the
privatisation of rail lines and rail
infrastructure is detrimental to the customer
in terms of cost and service, and to the
Government in terms of huge financial bail
outs.
The state owned Directly Operated
Railways, which runs the East Coast
Mainline, has generated and paid the
Government £640 million in premiums and
profits since 2009. Surely, even George
Osborne and this Government, given the
current financial state of the country, would
want to keep the franchise in public hands.
Pocket the profits for the public; help cut
the deficit; perhaps even invest in
infrastructure. But not this Government.
Clearly, for them private shareholders
interests come first. Yet another example of
this Government’s failed and ideologically
driven economic policies.
No one denies that the East Coast Mainline
suffers its own problems of chronic
underinvestment, particularly with what is
now very tired rolling stock. However, let’s
not forget that this is a burden they inherited
from the privately owned rail firms, GNER
and then National Express: problems
exacerbated by the Hatfield and Selby rail
crashes.
The only way to run an effective rail service
is ensuring the infrastructure is up to scratch
through continued investment. Yet from a
private sector perspective, the overriding
objective is not to invest in maintenance and
customer satisfaction but to return funds to
shareholders. Privatisation within the rail
sector is consistently lacking and
detrimental to customers and the industry.
Why privatise a service that has been
successful?
One needs only look back on the
tumultuous demise of Railtrack in 2002, the
problems were numerous, but the straw that
broke the camel’s back was the requirement
for essential safety repairs following the
Paddington and Hatfield disasters. Railtrack,
a privately owned company answerable to
shareholders rather than the public, were, to
put it bluntly badly managed and effectively
bankrupt and were unwilling to try and fund
urgent safety improvements, as well as
normal running costs. Subsequently, as we
all know, the company was put into
administration and Network Rail, the not-for-
dividend body, took over the running of the
UK's rail network.
And let’s be honest who really trusts this
Government to be able to sort out the future
of our rail industry. Take the West Coast
franchise for instance, which has cost the
Government at least £50m, was a complete
shambles; and has now resulted in Virgin,
who lost to FirstGroup in the tendering
process, to have their contract extended
until 2017 and has left the government’s
whole franchising timetable in chaos
creating uncertainty for passenger and
workers alike.
Of course, as a squadron of pigs fly
overhead, we can all be reassured that this
Government, particularly the Chancellor, are
doing everything they can to grow the
economy and competently manage the
nation; forget criticism and advise from the
IMF – George Osborne has his finger on the
button. So George, that’s two cappuccinos
please.
Ian Mearns
Labour MP for Gateshead and a member of
the RMT Parliamentary Group
EAST COAST MAINLINE AND
PUBLIC OWNERSHIP
Parliamentary column