Searchable article text
RMTnews :: march 2008 :: www.rmt.org.uk
10
T
he £58 million half-year
profits posted by the Go-
Ahead group recently should
be mourned as another huge
loss to the transport industry.
A 23 per cent increase in
the group's rail operating
profits underlines that the rail
franchising system diverts cash
out of the industry while
passengers suffer overcrowding
and year-on-year inflation-
busting fares increases.
The group's £31.4 million
rail profit includes £300,000
squeezed out of the new
London Midland franchise in
just six weeks.
This highlights that fact that
rail franchising is only a
success for the shareholders
who are draining enormous
sums of fare-payers' and
taxpayers' money out of the
industry.
For the passengers who
suffer more and more
overcrowding and inflation-
busting fares hikes, and for
staff who have to face the
daily consequences, it is a
disaster.
RMT members at Wilts and
Dorset bus company who have
had to strike against excessive
driving time will no doubt take
note that Go-Ahead's bus
operations have a healthy
profit margin of more than 12
per cent.
"When the time comes to
submit pay claims at the
various Go-Ahead subsidiaries
our members will bear in mind
that shareholders have been
handed an interim dividend of
nearly 11 per cent," Bob Crow
said.
Despite these huge profits,
Go Ahead is considering
pulling out of the Birmingham
bus market after writing off the
entire value of its Go West
Midlands bus operation.
In its interim results
statement, Go Ahead said the
West Midlands business was
loss making and wrote down
its value by £8.2 million,
despite having paid just £4.5
million for the operations in
2005 and 2006.
Chief executive Keith
Ludeman said that the write
down was “a reflection of my
style and also that of my new
finance director". The ‘style’ is
clearly profit, profit and profit.
T
alks between London
Underground and the Tube’s
two biggest unions over safety
and staffing issues broke down
when the company said it
intended to continue using
agency and security staff and
‘mobile station supervisors’,
despite promises otherwise.
Negotiators representing
more than 7,500 TSSA and RMT
station staff and drivers were
astonished to hear that LUL
intended to renege on its pledge
to ensure that all station staff
are directly employed and fully
trained to LUL safety standards.
The unions are in dispute
with LUL over a range of issues,
including ticket-office closures,
lone working and de-staffing,
which add up to an attack on
safety standards and the
casualisation of safety critical
work.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said after finally getting
LUL to discuss these matters the
company went back on its
promise to stop using agency
and security staff on stations.
“When LUL took guards
away they said there was no
need to worry because there
would be enough station staff to
keep things safe, but the
concept of mobile station
supervisors drives a coach and
horses through the safety regime
and the rule book, and
passengers should be worried.
“What happens when there’s
a fire, someone under a train or
any one of dozens of possible
emergencies and the person in
charge is at the wrong station or
even stuck between stations?”
Bob said.
TSSA senior regional
organiser John Page also said
experienced station supervisors
are a cornerstone of Tube safety.
“Their key role is to oversee
safe operation and cope with
emergencies, and if you expect
any individual to supervise
several stations at once that
becomes impossible.
“This dispute boils down to
LUL wanting to put casual staff
on stations in place of properly
trained Tube staff,” John said
Companywatch
GO-AHEAD PROFIT IS TRANSPORT’S LOSS
TUBE SAFETY TALKS BREAK
DOWN AFTER LUL RENEGES
ON AGENCY-STAFF PLEDGE