Searchable article text
The industry report into the
Grayrigg crash highlights the
need to tackle systematic
management failings, eradicate
the ‘contract culture’ still
prevalent in Network Rail and
to reverse spending cuts.
RMT also condemned the
“shabby” attempt by Network
rail to divert attention to
systematic failings by pointing
the finger of blame at one of its
own supervisors.
Renewing its call for
renewals work to follow the
bulk of maintenance back in-
house, RMT also called for the
re-creation of a single command
structure and to end the
fragmentation that has blighted
the industry since privatisation.
The union also demanded a
joint public inquiry into both
Grayrigg and the 2002 Potter’s
Bar derailment – whose causes
were still unknown – with a
remit that would include the
structure and continued
fragmentation of the industry.
WHY?
RMT general secretary Bob Crow
said that the report revealed
how the Grayigg accident may
have happened, but revealed
little about why it happened.
He said that it did not
explain how a set of points in
place for 20 years could
deteriorate to such a disastrous
condition in less than a
fortnight.
“Network Rail’s report points
to systematic failings, but it also
points to a lack of resources,
and we know that NR has faced
a 30 per cent cut in its spending
targets over the last five years.
“On the ground that has led
to serious concerns about the
workload placed on individuals,
which we have raised with the
company on a number of
occasions.
“Network Rail is well aware
that maintenance patrolling was
truncated into a restricted
Sunday morning timescale, as
routine inspection and
maintenance functions become
secondary to extended
timetables and faster line
speeds.
“It is therefore very shabby
indeed for Network rail to
attempt to divert attention from
its systematic failings by using
the media to scapegoat one of
its own supervisors,” he said.
SAFETY CULTURE
Bob said that the ethos should
be about getting things done
properly and safely, but there
was still too much emphasis on
getting things done quickly and
cheaply, and the challenge
facing now Network rail is to
change that culture.
“Many of the working
arrangements still in place on
Britain’s railways were
introduced by the private sector
contractors, and the use of
points maintenance teams was
introduced by Carillion, despite
RMT opposition, and system
was in place on the WCML at
Lambrigg.
“Some private operators
have suggested that they should
be given responsibility for
maintaining infrastructure, but
that would be recipe for more of
the disastrous fragmentation
that the industry should be
leaving firmly behind,” Bob
Crow said.
RMTnews :: october 2007 :: www.rmt.org.uk
18
REVERSE THE ‘CONTRACT
CULTURE’ IN THE RAIL INDUSTRY
RMT condemns ‘shabby’ attempt
to divert attention from
management failings in the report
into the Grayrigg rail crash