Searchable article text
www.rmt.org.uk :: august/september 2007 :: RMTnews
25
EDM 2002
METRONET AND LONDON
UNDERGROUND
That this House notes with
concern the collapse of Metronet,
which was responsible for two
thirds of London Underground
maintenance and renewals;
further notes with concern that
the collapse may leave a debt of
billions of pounds which might
have to be paid for by the tax
and fare payer; further notes the
success of Network Rail on the
mainline railway of bringing
maintenance back in-house
which has resulted in reduced
delays and greater control over
costs; believes that bringing
London Underground
maintenance back in-house
would result in a more economic
and efficient Tube; and therefore
welcomes the Mayor of London's
indications that some of
Metronet's contracts should be
brought back in-house and urges
the Government to support this
position.
John McDonnell MP
M
ore than 2,600 members of
London Underground’s two
biggest unions are to be balloted
for strike action over the threat
to jobs and conditions at failed
Tube privateer Metronet.
RMT and TSSA is asking
members to vote to strike over
the failure of the bankrupt
company’s administrator to
guarantee that there will be no
job losses, forced transfers or
cuts in pension entitlements as a
result of the company’s financial
collapse.
“We warned from the start
that we would not allow our
members’ jobs and conditions to
be decimated by Metronet’s
death throes,” RMT general
secretary Bob Crow said.
“It is unacceptable that our
members face losing ten per
cent of their pensions because
Metronet’s fatcat shareholders
decided to pull the plug,” he
said.
TSSA assistant general
secretary Manuel Cortes said
that the job losses were the last
desperate throw by Metronet to
avoid administration.
“As we all know, this gamble
failed.
"The forced transfer of staff
to Bombardier was Metronet's
parting gift to one of its main
shareholders which will saddle
passengers and taxpayers with
huge ongoing costs," he said.
R
MT repeatedly warned London
Underground of safety issues in the area
of track on the Central Line where a train
derailed during the early rush hour on July
on a stretch of track maintained by
Metronet.
Up to six carriages came off the rails on
the westbound Central Line between Mile
End and Bethnal Green stations.
Within the exact same vicinity of the
derailment, RMT warned management that in
October 2006, November 2006 and again in
May that materials stored in a bolt-hole
between the stations were not secure
resulting in trains striking obstructions on
the track.
This union also wrote to London
Underground in April demanding an
investigation. LUL claimed that it had
‘investigated’ the problems did not involve
any safety reps and appears to amount to
assurances from Metronet that things would
be sorted out.
This form of self-regulation by a private
consortium that exists to make profits for its
shareholders seriously undermines safety.
It is the third serious Tube derailment in
less than four years, including the Chancery
Lane derailment and the one at White City,
since the privatisation of LUL infrastructure
maintenance under PPP.
RMT reiterated its call for London mayor
Ken Livingstone to take these private
contracts introduced under PPP back in-
house.
An independent investigation into the
latest derailment is now underway by the
Rail Accident Investigation Board (RAIB).
RMT AND TSSA
BALLOTING FOR
STRIKE ACTION AT
METRONET
RMT WARNED OF DANGERS PRIOR
TO MILE END DERAILMENT