Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: january/february 2025 :: RMTnews
18
Trainline's destructive practice
of ripping off passengers,
misleading the general public,
and undermining the integrity
of the railways according to
new RMT survey results.
The survey, which asked
more than 2,600 rail workers
about their experiences,
uncovered a range of serious
problems with Trainline's
ticketing system — bogus
tickets, excessive pricing, and
confusing fare options.
The results show that
Trainline does not deliver best-
value fares and has put profits
ahead of its commitment to
deliver a public service.
Trainline has released its
half-year results, following a
September update revealing
£2 billion in ticket sales and a
17 per cent revenue increase
to £106 million in the first half
of the year.
RMT general secretary Mick
Lynch said that Trainline was
clearly a profiteering machine
that was ripping off
passengers and unnecessarily
costing taxpayers.
“Their model relies on
hidden fees, deceptive ticket
options, and overpriced fares
– all designed to boost
shareholder profits at the
public’s expense,” he said.
KEY FINDINGS:
Invalid Tickets and Extra
Costs: Over 90 per cent of
RMT members surveyed
reported that Trainline sells
tickets invalid for passengers’
journeys, forcing many to pay
twice or risk penalties.
Nearly 80 per cent of staff
said that they had
encountered passengers who
had bought tickets through
Trainline only to find them
useless and requiring a new
purchase.
UNFAIR FEES
Trainline also adds booking
fees on almost all transactions,
with 60 per cent of RMT
members reporting that
Trainline’s prices were
consistently higher than
necessary. The platform also
frequently fails to apply
discounts such as GroupSave
or regional offers, leaving
customers to pay more than
they would directly at a ticket
office.
Staff also reported that
Trainline’s information about
train schedules, cancellations,
and platforms was often
inaccurate or outdated. Unlike
direct ticketing from train
operators, Trainline’s platform
does not integrate with real-
time updates, causing many
passengers to miss trains or
receive no compensation for
delays.
Over 90 per cent of RMT
members also believe that
Trainline fails to provide
passengers with the best-value
fare. Trainline’s default settings
prioritise more expensive fares
rather than transparently
displaying cheaper options.
Its ‘Splitsave’ feature can
often be confusing, with
tickets restricted to specific
trains and times, leaving many
passengers unexpectedly out
of pocket.
These findings show that
Trainline’s model is
incompatible with a fair and
integrated public rail service.
The union has argued that
a publicly owned Great British
Railways (GBR), as proposed
by Labour, would eliminate the
need for third-party
profiteering by bringing
ticketing directly under public
control.
This would deliver
transparent, best-value fares to
passengers and would retain
and enhance the vital role of
ticket offices and onboard
train staff.
Mr Lynch added that a
nationalised, publicly-owned
rail ticketing system would
mean transparency, fair prices,
and best-value fares for every
passenger.
“RMT supports plans to
simplify ticketing and the
creation of Great British
Railways should be an
opportunity to tackle the rip-
off and the confusion that
Trainline has thrived off.
“It is a first step to ensuring
rail ticketing returns to public
ownership, putting passengers
and staff first,” he said.
STOP THE
TRAINLINE RIP-OFF
Union finds that Trainline's ticketing system can lead
to excessive pricing and confusing fare options