Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: november/december 2024 :: RMTnews
22
If you’re still working, you
might think that pensions
haven’t got much to do with
you. You’d be wrong as the
conditions which pensioners
are currently campaigning for
will be the ones you inherit.
That is why RMT works closely
with the National Pensioners
Convention (NPC) and why our
branch affiliates at regional
level.
The recent furore over
withdrawal of the Winter Fuel
Payment highlighted the
ongoing problem of pensioner
poverty: it is estimated that
more than two million currently
live below the poverty level.
It will result in a higher rate
of winter deaths this year
(more than 5,000 last year),
because there will also be a 10
per cent increase in fuel
prices. I wonder how many of
those Labour MPs who voted
against September’s Early Day
Motion which called for a halt
to the WFP withdrawal will feel
any remorse as the deaths are
announced?
People are rightly angered
and disgusted that a so-called
Labour government refuses to
tax the rich and, instead,
punishes the poor.
But it’s a bit of a distraction
from the real issue. The
underlying problem, which no
government wants to deal
with, is the continued
existence of severe poverty
and not just among pensioners
in a country which is ranked in
the top six of the world’s
wealthiest nations.
The real issue is that the UK
state pension is too low: it
represents 17 per cent of
average final earnings, while
the average across other
European countries is 57 per
cent. The Winter Fuel Payment
was introduced by a Labour
government in 1997 as a
concession to the problem of
pensioner poverty when the
real change should have been
an increase in the state
pension.
The government says the
“black hole” prevents this,
while committing to massive
increases in defence
expenditure and no
commitment even to dealing
with rich tax dodgers, never
mind introducing an additional
wealth tax.
The 1946 National
Insurance Act was a contract
between working people and
the state to provide a state
insurance scheme, while
income tax would provide
services. The NI Fund currently
provides 14.8 per cent of
government revenue and is
always in surplus. Instead of
using this surplus to improve
pensions, governments borrow
from it to fund other projects.
Furthermore, governments
and even trade unions have
relied on the market-place to
organise occupational
pensions. Apart from the fact
that 27 per cent of households
have no occupational pension,
recent economic decline has
impacted severely on many
occupational schemes. Clearly
then, Social Insurance and
collective provision are the
best methods for ensuring a
decent standard of living in
retirement.
The NPC support the
demand for a Living State
Pension, based on 70 per cent
of the Living Wage. We
believe there should be no
more borrowing from the
National Insurance Fund, but
surpluses should be used to
benefit pensions. The Upper
Earnings Limit on NI
contributions, which allows
higher earners to pay less NI,
should be abolished and the
Triple Lock maintained.
The 35 years’ qualifying
payment period for the new
state pension must be
abolished. How many of
today’s young workers, in an
economy dominated by
precarious employment, can
hope to qualify? Eliminating
poverty among all sections of
the community must become a
priority for government – the
first step being a Wealth Tax.
Above all, we need a united
struggle. Unions and the TUC
must work alongside
pensioner organisations and
prioritise the struggle for a
Living State Pension, rather
than a state pension as a fall-
back income. Pensions are too
important to be left to the
vagaries of the capitalist
market with no democratic
control over funds.
GIVE US A LIVING
STATE PENSION
Glen Burrows and Kevin Williams of RMT’s South
Wales & West retired branch demand action
BANNER: Bristol retired members Glen Burrows and Tony Jakeman