Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: february 2022 :: RMTnews
26
The two biggest employers in
the east London borough of
Poplar one hundred years
were the railways and the
docks. Our forerunner unions
had plenty of members there.
Their jobs involved long hours
and low pay, but they were
unionised, so they were
fighting for, and winning,
improvements.
Like the rest of Poplar’s
residents, they lived in
overcrowded housing,
breathed polluted air and died
of poverty-related illnesses
such tuberculosis (TB). But
they were fighting back in their
community too. The unions
were heavily involved in the
local Labour Party, which in
turn supported the unions and
their struggles – including the
pre-war dock strike and the
post-war national railways
strike.
In 1919, Labour won a
majority on Poplar Borough
Council for the first time.
Previously, most working-class
people – and all women – did
not have the right to vote, so a
privileged minority had
elected Tories, Liberals,
employers and clerics to run
the borough; they feathered
their own nests and allowed
the working-class people of
Poplar to continue living in
destitution.
The newly-elected Labour
Council included several
transport workers and union
activists, including Albert
Baker, Joe Banks, Joseph
Hammond and James Jones of
the Poplar no.1 branch of the
National Union of Railwaymen
(NUR). It included socialist
women such as Minnie
Lansbury and Julia Scurr.
The Council immediately
began improving the lot of the
people who had elected it. It
built new housing, expanded
maternity services, improved
libraries and swimming baths,
brought the charity-run TB
clinic into municipal
ownership, increased council
workers’ wages, and did much
more besides.
But in 1920, economic
recession struck. Export trade
collapsed, so dockers were
thrown out of work, and the
knock-on effects saw
thousands of other jobs lost
too. Local people needed
their council services more
than ever, but Poplar Council
did not have the money to
fund them.
Councils had to raise all
their money by taxing local
residents. There were no
significant central government
grants or pooling of costs
across London. From the
meagre amount that Poplar’s
working-class residents could
afford, its council had to fund
all the services they needed,
including maintenance for
those who were unemployed
or impoverished (what we
would now call welfare
benefits).
Poplar Council faced a
choice: abandon the
improvements by cutting
services or raising rates or defy
the law. It chose defiance.
In early 1921, a conference
POPLAR: THE BOROUGH
THAT FOUGHT BACK
AND WON
Janine Booth explains why the Poplar rates
revolt a hundred years ago matters today
ARREST: Councillor Minnie Lansbury on her way to be taken into custody at Poplar Town Hall