RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: october 2017 :: RMTnews 16 Following the end of the Second World War the Labour government nationalised key industries, such as railways, steel and electricity. It argued that the government would be able to run these industries in the best interests of society. This is a strong argument in favor of nationalisation as it abolishes economic power from the few monopolists. It also enables the government to take steps for the welfare of the public. As we can see from current rail disputes the rail companies care little for the welfare of passengers, especially if they can reduce staff numbers who are in charge of welfare in order to increase their profits. Currently new trains are also being paid for, in most cases, not by the TOCs but by ROSCOs who then lease them to the TOCs at expensive rates from around the world. Ultimately the price of this investment is being paid for by the taxpayer. If rolling stock was procured by one public-owned company it would be able to place bigger orders that would provide savings by buying in bulk and avoid the extortionate leasing charges that ROSCOS place upon TOCs. In the public sector any profit could be used to re-invest back into the system. But under the current set up the profit is extracted by the ROSCOS that are owned by banks, the private train companies and shareholders. This is a very poor deal for the British taxpayer that faces ever increasing fare rises and no return on their investment by way of taxes paid. When rail was in the public sector all the regions of the country developed equally creating a more balanced approach to transport spending. However, most major rail projects at the current time seem to be focused on London and its economy such as HS2, Cross Rail and Cross Rail Two. In the North there has been some spending such as the building of the Ordsall Chord that will link Manchester RENATIONALISE! Neil Sharples of Wigan branch argues for Britain’s railways and other services to be brought back into the public sector