Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: october 2017 :: RMTnews
8
RMT welcomed Transport for
London's ruling last month that
Taxi app firm Uber will not be
issued with a private hire
operator licence renewal.
RMT general secretary Mick
Cash said that Uber had
consistently failed to reach
acceptable standards of service,
safety and security.
“We applaud this decision
which is a victory for
passengers and also a vital step
in protecting the livelihoods of
the skilled and experienced
London taxi drivers who are
being unfairly undercut by Uber.
“This is a success for our
campaigning and all those who
work in the trade and must be a
stepping stone to end the
deregulation in the industry
which has created such chaotic,
unsafe and exploitative
conditions.
“The next steps should
include the introduction of a
statutory definition of plying for
hire and also for MPs to get
behind the Private Members Bill
put forward by Daniel Zeichner
MP to reform the taxi and
private hire industry,” he said.
For many years London taxi
drivers have been regulated to
protect often vulnerable
passengers and drivers have had
to prove that they are fit and
proper to do so.
Minicab drivers have been
able to transport people
provided those journeys are pre-
booked. However, this important
distinction has recently been
undermined by Uber.
Uber is a US software
company, operating in the UK
via a network of companies
routed through low tax
jurisdictions. It matches people
who want services, with those
providing them.
It set up in many cities,
offering services that were
frequently prohibited or were
provided in a way that is
incompatible with existing rules.
Uber’s approach was to
disregard or fudge existing
regulations in order to become
established and deal with
compliance later.
In London, there was
sufficient legal ambiguity to
enable regulators to drag their
feet about blocking Uber.
Transport for London decided
that while rules limiting who
could pick up passengers –
known as “plying for hire” and
“ranking for hire” – are well-
established, they may not
extend to transactions carried
out online. Specifically, TfL
stated that it was unclear
whether a minicab advertising
its availability and location to
passengers on an electronic
platform amounts to “plying for
hire”.
Once established, Uber
ratcheted up the commission
which it charged drivers, who
have been found by the
employment tribunal to be
bogusly self-employed, thereby
cutting their earnings to below
minimum wage level.
Despite growing evidence
that low pay had forced drivers
to work excessive hours the
company became politically too
big to fail.
RMT has been leading the
fight back against the company,
lobbying politicians, holding
protests, organising a letter
writing campaign, feeding into
consultative committees and
threatening legal action.
In the face of a vast
expansion in the minicab fleet,
leading to road congestion
which has sent average traffic
speeds in central London to
eight mph and faced with
evidence of sex attacks on
passengers, the authorities ran
out of excuses not to act.
The union put pressure on
TfL, the Mayor and the
Metropolitan Police by threating
legal action. RMT attacked the
ongoing illegality of Uber’s
operational practices since its
original license grant in 2012
and their continued flaunting of
the law on “plying for hire”.
As a result TfL and the
London Mayor updated the law
to explicitly extend existing
rules to online platforms and
now TfL has declined to renew
Uber’s license on the grounds of
TRANSPORT FOR
LONDON BOOTS OUT UBER
Union plays key role in the
decision by threating legal action