Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: july/August 2016 :: RMTnews
9
Neil Bibby (West Scotland,
Lab): To ask the First Minister
what the Scottish government’s
position is on the industrial
dispute between the RMT and
ScotRail.
The First Minister (Nicola
Sturgeon): I am extremely
disappointed that we are
seeing industrial action on our
railways. It is, after all, the
travelling public who lose out in
such situations. I once again
urge both parties to reopen
meaningful discussions and
work towards an agreement
that prevents further strikes
from going ahead. Safety is
paramount in our rail network.
Scottish ministers do not set
ScotRail’s operational policy,
but we expect employers and
unions to arrive at a safe,
efficient and customer-focused
solution, and we believe that
that can be done with no
further strike action. A
multiagency response team
has operated on each of the
strike dates and will do so if
any more go ahead, and all
modes of transport have
continued to perform well.
Neil Bibby: The First Minister
knows that conductor
operation guarantees
passengers that a rail worker in
addition to the driver will
always be on a train to assist
passengers, including in the
event of an emergency. Can
she tell us whether the
Government believes that
passengers will be at more risk
or at less risk if there is an
accident or incident and there
is no longer a second rail
worker to assist? In addition to
safety concerns, does the First
Minister believe that disabled
passengers will be
disadvantaged if they no longer
have the guarantee of the
assistance of a rail worker?
The First Minister: Herein lies
the complete misunderstanding
of the issue that we are dealing
with. The franchise mandates
ScotRail to have a second
member of staff on board each
and every single train, unless
there are exceptional
circumstances. That is audited
regularly. This is not an issue
about whether there will no
longer be a second member of
staff on the train;this is an
issue about whether it is
drivers who open the doors.
That policy of driver-controlled
doors has been in operation on
many of our rail services with
no safety concerns for around
30 years. When I travelled from
Irvine to Glasgow in my
university days, the train was
operated in that way. I repeat:
this is emphatically not about
having a situation in which
there are not two members of
staff on the train. If Labour
wants to be helpful in the
matter, it could start by
understanding the issue and
putting the right information out
there—not the wrong
information.”
HOLYROOD AND
WESTMINSTER DEBATE DOO
At First Minsters Questions Nicola Sturgeon showed she did not understand that
when you introduce DOO you lose the guarantee of a guard on every train. Or had
she just showed which side she was on?
At a Westminster debate Shadow Secretary of State for Transport Andy McDonald MP
(Lab) told the government to nationalise Govia Rail and meet with RMT over DOO
“GTR is widely recognised as
the worst train operator in the
country, following a sustained
period of cancellations,
lateness, worsening industrial
relations and failed planning
that makes a mockery of the
Government’s regular sermons
on the benefits of rail
privatisation. There is cross-
party consensus on the need
for GTR to be stripped of the
franchise.”
“The Opposition would like to
see our rail services back in
public operation, but to ignore
the clear evidence of the
essential service protection
that the public sector provides
through the operator of last
resort is entirely reckless.”
“The government is committed
to preserving the GTR
franchise, whatever the cost to
passengers, staff or the
taxpayer.
“The taxpayer is paying GTR an
estimated £1.17 billion every
year in management fees for
this dysfunctional service, and
that does not include the huge
levels of investment in track
and stations through publicly
owned Network Rail every year,
including the redevelopment of
London Bridge.
“Neither sickness levels nor
industrial action are
responsible for the misery that
Southern commuters in
particular have contended with
for more than a year now.
“The decline in industrial
relations is a direct result of the
close relationship between the
Government and GTR. When
senior civil servants are quoted
at public meetings stating to
passengers that they “have got
to break” rail unions then the
problem is entirely of the
government’s making.”
“Labour is clear that the
government’s failure to include
meaningful penalties in the
franchise is at the root of
GTR’s declining performance,
we call on the government to
strip GTR of the franchise.
“Let me turn quickly to the
current dispute. Even the
industry-funded Rail Safety and
Standards Board has
acknowledged that driver-only
operated services ‘may
increase the likelihood of an
event occurring or increase the
severity of its consequence.’
“The issue is whether risks to
passengers increase when
things go wrong if passengers
no longer have a binding safety
guarantee from a second
member of on-board staff who
is fully trained in safety-critical
procedures. GTR’s proposed
new role of an on-board
supervisor will not be that of a
guard or a conductor; it will
lack critical safety training in
carriage and passenger
protection in the event of an
emergency incident.
“GTR and the government have
also claimed that there will be
no deskilling or dumbing down
as a result of the GTR
proposals to extend DOO on
Southern services, yet the
Minister told members of the
Transport Committee on
Monday that no train that
currently has a second person
on board would lose that
person, and that she would
ensure that the safety-critical
role is maintained.
“We hope she will confirm today
that that safety-critical role will
be maintained over the life of
this and future franchises.
“I note that RMT offered to
suspend its industrial action as
long as GTR suspends the
DOO extension plans. It surely
makes sense now for the
Minister to invite RMT to meet
her at the earliest opportunity
to discuss the terms of a
settlement with GTR that
would also apply to future
franchises.
“That should allow both parties
time to reach a conclusion to
this dispute, if not to the
performance problems that
have dogged GTR since its
inception, which we believe
can only be remedied by
removal of the franchise,” he
said.
Responding in the debate
Claire Perry said that she was
“ashamed” to be rail minister
and resigned two days later!