Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: may 2015 :: RMTnews
7
R
MT has challenged the
offshore energy industry to
prove that safety can still be
delivered against a backdrop of
cuts to jobs and attacks on shift
patterns and working
conditions.
The challenge comes on the
day of a major offshore safety
event that reiterated that the
industry is a ‘major accident
hazard’ (MAH) working
environment governed by a
"goal setting" approach to
health and safety, meaning the
industry objective is
"continuous improvement" in
safety standards.
RMT has pointed out that as
the industry claims that safety
is, "the number one priority” it
needs to prove that the health
and safety of workers will be
improved with the changes to
shift patterns, working hours,
workloads and the removal of
welfare provisions.
The union currently believes
that these changes will have a
detrimental effect on the health
and will inevitably impact on
the safety of operations.
RMT general secretary Mick
Cash warned that the enforced
changes are a recipe for disaster.
"We are being inundated
with concerns about the safety
of offshore operations and many
workers are expressing fears
about the effects of increased
workloads and working hours
on their health.
“In a MAH industry such as
oil and gas we would expect
responsible employers to
conduct research into the impact
of significant changes to
operations.
“Our members report there
has been no attempt to consider
the effects of these changes.
“We are therefore demanding
the oil companies prove how
these changes will deliver on
the objective of continuous
improvement in health and
safety performance,” he said.
Figures from ONS confirm
that profitability of offshore
companies nose-dived at the
end of last year, with UK
Continental Shelf (UKCS)
companies’ net rate of return
falling to 10.4 per cent in
Quarter 4 (Oct to Dec 2014) –
the lowest rate since the ONS
started collecting figures in
1997.
This is against a net rate of
return of 11.9 per cent in
Quarter 4 (Oct to Dec 2014) for
private non-financial companies
across the UK economy (down
from 12.3per cent in Quarter 3
(July to Sept) 2014).
RMT national secretary Steve
Todd said that the figures
confirmed that the next
government should support
RMT’s call for protections for
the offshore workforce to
prevent a premature decline in
exploration and production
activity offshore.
He also said that members
had revealed that one employers
association had actually
acknowledged there are
increased risks associated with
the imposition of extended
working patterns.
“The Offshore Contractors
Association has produced a
document which sets out a 'risk
assessment' process to deal with
the hazards of extending shift
patterns.
“Our members argue that the
basic principle of risk
assessment is to mitigate against
hazards, therefore by
acknowledging that increasing
shift patterns introduces hazards
the industry is in fact increasing
risks.
“The fact that workers will
spend more time annually
exposed to the inherent risks
associated with a MAH
environment demonstrates
beyond doubt that the goal
setting objective of continuous
improvement is being
abandoned by this industry and
that in fact the "number one
priority" is not safety, it is
unquestionably profit.
“In the absence of any
verifiable proof demonstrating
that safety performance will not
be detrimentally affected we will
be challenging the Health and
Safety Executive to take a
critical look at the actions of oil
companies across the UK
sector,” he said.
PROVE OFFSHORE
OPERATIONS WILL
BE SAFER