Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: february 2015 :: RMTnews
21
The Transatlantic Trade and
Investment Partnership (TTIP)
is a comprehensive free trade
and investment treaty
currently being negotiated –
in secret – between the
European Union and the US.
The main goal of TTIP is to
remove regulatory ‘barriers’,
ie national laws and
regulations, which restrict the
potential profits to be made
by transnational corporations
on both sides of the Atlantic.
Campaigners haver warned
that this could led to over one
million jobs and hand global
corporations the right to sue
countries in secret courts if
they refuse to privatise public
services.
Current ‘regulatory
barriers’ being discussed in
secret are in reality some of
our most prized social
standards and environmental
regulations, such as trade
union rights, food safety
rules, regulations on the use
of toxic chemicals, digital
privacy laws and even new
banking safeguards
introduced to prevent a repeat
of the 2008 financial crisis.
In addition to this
deregulation agenda, TTIP
seeks to create new markets
by opening up public services
and government procurement
contracts to competition from
transnational corporations,
threatening to introduce a
further wave of privatisations
in key sectors, such as health
and education.
Most worrying of all, TTIP
seeks to grant foreign
investors a new right to sue
sovereign governments in
front of ad hoc arbitration
tribunals for loss of profits
resulting from public policy
decisions.
This ‘investor-State dispute
settlement’ mechanism
effectively elevates
transnational capital to a
status equivalent to the
nation-state itself, and
threatens to undermine the
most basic principles of
democracy in the EU and US
alike.
Many states are already
feeling the sting of investor-
state disputes. For example
the Swedish energy company
Vattenfall is suing against
Germany's decision to phase
out nuclear power. In the US
the use of such clauses in
NAFTA has led to regulation-
chilling cases, such as one
£160 million case challenging
a drilling moratorium in
Québec. In the case of Tecmed
v. Mexico a tribunal ruled
that Mexico had not acted
"free from ambiguity and
totally transparently" when a
local government decided not
to re-license a waste
treatment plant because of
environmental concerns.
Opposition to TTIP is
growing along with the
campaign to prevent pro-
business government officials
from signing away key social
and environmental standards.
All people are encouraged to
join this resistance by getting
in touch with their local
campaigns.
The charity War on Want
has revealed that the
European Commission’s own
internal impact assessment
acknowledged that there
would be “prolonged and
substantial” adjustment
costs caused by TTIP could
lead to the loss of over one
million jobs.
War on Want Executive
Director John Hilary has
written a pamphlet on TTIP
which is available from:
www.waronwant.org
War on Want
44-48 Shepherdess Walk
London N1 7JP
Tel 020 7324 5040
support@waronwant.org
ETF warned.
RMT general secretary Mick
Cash has written, in solidarity
with the Canadian Maritime and
Supply Chain Coalition, to urge
the Canadian government to
take the following steps in
subsequent CETA negotiations:
- To exclude shipping from the
scope of CETA to prevent the
elimination of thousands of
Canadian jobs by weakening
and abolishing the Cabotage
laws;
- To oppose any further
proposals aimed at
jeopardising jobs, skills and
collectively bargained
standards Canadian
transportation sectors;
- To provide assurances that
CETA will not enter into force
until it has been subject to
full democratic scrutiny in
the Canadian and European
Parliaments;
- To support calls for a
referendum on the trade deal
before it becomes law and
any damage made
irreversible.
Ultimately TTIP and CETA
negotiations are really seeking
to massively weaken standards
and regulations intended to
protect people and our
environment.
A new report ‘Trading Away
Democracy’ published by various
NGOs, trade unions and
campaign groups based in
Canada and Europe warns that
Canada’s experience with
NAFTA has already opened the
gateway to that country being
sued 35 times. Canada has lost
or settled six claims and has
paid damages to foreign
investors totalling over 171.5
million Canadian dollars.
These investor-state lawsuits
are decided by private
commercial arbitrators who are
paid for each case they hear,
with a clear tendency to
interpret the law in favour of
investors.
These companies would like
to see any remaining ‘barriers’
to their profiteering to be
removed, irrespective of the fact
that the very reason for the
creation of these rules is to
protect people, consumers, and
nature.
If the CETA is signed and
ratified with Investor-state
dispute settlement intact,
democracy will suffer while
corporations gain new tools for
frustrating any number of
policies designed to protect the
environment, public health,
public services and the
conservation of resources and,
crucially, to make our society
more sustainable and equitable.
People, not corporations, should
determine the future of the
economy and society.
WHAT IS TTIP?