Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: february 2015 :: RMTnews
Parliamentary column
To be honest, at times, it feels
like Parliament has got a ration
on common sense.
Take the forced re-privatisation
of the East Coast Mainline.
As you’ll know, when National
Express failed it and bailed out,
East Coast was taken back into
public hands.
In its five years under public
stewardship, it was turned
around. It returned nearly
£1billion to the taxpayer,
increased passenger numbers,
introduced a new timetable,
improved punctuality, invested
in ageing rolling stock and
achieved an industry leading
approach to recycling and
reducing carbon emissions.
The move to flog it back, cash-
cow like, to private profiteers
defied all business (and
common) sense.
No doubt you also share my
dismay that the Thameslink,
Southern and Great Northern
super-franchise wasn’t awarded
to our public sector. Instead it
went to state companies in
Europe, threatening our services
and the livelihoods of hundreds
of skilled railway workers here,
including in my own city of
Brighton.
It’s appalling that passenger
services, welfare and worker
rights would be so jeopardised.
Privatisation has
comprehensively failed. Our
once thriving railways, now
fragmented, are today
characterised by poor services
and soaring fares (up by more
than an eye-watering 20% for
Brighton-London commuters
under the current Coalition
Government). They’re ripping off
passengers, letting down (and
letting go) workers, harming the
economy and failing the
environment.
We could keep puffing along.
Keep patching up a punctured
system, paying ever more for
ever less.
Or we can fix the fault at the
source, by bringing the
ownership and operation of our
railways back into public hands.
RMT is the leading voice in the
campaign to do just that. It’s
given me essential support as I
fight the cause in Parliament,
and my Railways Bill – which
calls for franchises to be
returned to public hands as they
expire, or fail – draws on the
impressive research in its
Rebuilding Rail report.
A publicly-owned railway will
provide quality services, fair
prices and protect our jobs.
The idea has its opponents, of
course, crying of a rose-tinted
return to the ‘dark days of
British Rail’.
There are certainly lessons to be
learned from British Rail. But
the system we once had was
undermined, undervalued and
underinvested. It didn't fail us –
our politicians did.
We need a new approach. I
want to see a fully public and
reunified railway. Network Rail
had to be taken into full public
ownership last year – so why
not finish the job?
And the modern, efficient,
affordable, clean, services
enjoyed in other parts of Europe
offer us a positive, forward-
thinking blueprint.
A new rail system should be
truly public - with workers and
passengers participating in
decision-making.
It should prioritise passengers,
not shareholders. Cut bonuses -
not staff (and with them their
wealth of experience and
knowledge). It should be
accessible to all - financially and
physically.
And it needn’t be a pipe dream.
We know de-privatisation is
popular with the public and
there’s also cross-bench
support.
But Labour’s Leadership is yet
to jump on board: Ed Miliband
would only invite public
operators to compete against
private companies for lucrative
rail contracts.
The proposal is a fence-sitting
fudge, as he well knows:
millions would be wasted in
bureaucratic bidding wars. Our
railways would remain, quite
literally, in pieces and, quite
probably, privatised.
Back the public, Mr Miliband, to
give us a reliable public railway
to be rightly proud of again:
you’d be welcomed if you did.
In the meantime, I’ll push my
Railways Bill at every
opportunity. There can be no let
up until common sense prevails,
and our railways are put right.
RMT has always been
successful in getting fairness
and justice for its members –
and it’s an honour to fight your
corner in Westminster.
Caroline Lucas is Green MP for
Brighton and her Railways Bill is
due its Second Reading in
Parliament on February 27
COMMON
SENSE
ON RAIL
9
L
abour MP John
McDonnell has welcomed
“a major and historic victory”
after a Parliamentary
committee agreed to amend
clause 5 of the Transport for
London Bill which he dubbed
a “public land grab”.
The Bill would have let
TfL team up with private
partners for land
development projects —
similar to the controversial
Earls Court “masterplan”.
While the committee
agreed to most of the Bill, the
amendment means that TfL
would need direct permission
from the Secretary of State to
enter limited partnerships.
Mr McDonnell, chair of
RMT’s parliamentary group,
pledged to “now take the
fight to the floor of the
Commons in order to try and
defeat this Bill” before its
third reading, due later this
year.
He urged Londoners to
lobby their MPs to oppose a
Bill that he warned if passed
“could result in the greatest
public land grab by
developers London has ever
seen”.
Campaigners also attended
the committee to to prevent
TfL from getting away with
future developments similar
to Capco’s demolition of Earls
Court.
The Earls Court
redevelopment, which TfL
entered into with Capco, will
bulldoze the famous venue
and two council estates in
order to erect luxury flats
that campaigners predict will
largely lie empty.
TfL failed to respond to
requests for comment.
VICTORY
AGAINST
SHADY
LAND
DEALS