Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: november/december 2013 :: RMTnews
17
and beyond.
Overseas companies, mainly
state owned, now control 65
per cent of Britain’s railways
proving that the government
are happy with state
ownership as long as it’s not
by the British state in the
interests of British people.
While European competitors
have been building high-
speed, modern rail networks
the backlog of essential repairs
and renewals in Britain has
been allowed to build up to an
estimated £1 billion leaving
services permanently on the
edge of disruption.
2000 safety-critical track
jobs have already been lost
and with the regulator
demanding another £1.7
billion of cuts, and train
companies moving to axe
guards and station staff to
boost profits, Britain’s rail
users face the prospect of
years of misery as demand
outstrips supply and infra-
structure deteriorates.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that November 5
was the time to remember two
decades of greed, exploitation
and political sabotage which
have dragged Britain’s
railways through the mud in
the name of private profit.
“It is also the time to renew
the fight to end this long-
running scandal and to bring
the entire network back under
public ownership.
“For twenty years the
political class has failed rail
passengers and workforce
while overseas state operators
have been allowed to plunder
our services to keep costs
down on their own turf.
“It is a shocking indictment
that £3.5 billion has been
robbed in private dividends
while the essential
maintenance backlog stands at
around £1 billion and profit is
placed head and shoulders
above safety.
“We remember the twenty
years of profiteering and
destruction on our railways
and we step up the fight to
bring the entire network back
under public control,” he said.
T
he referendum on Scottish
independence on September
18 2014 will be a monumental
moment in our nation’s history.
After 300 years of political
union those eligible to vote
including 16-18 year olds are to
be asked ‘Should Scotland be an
independent country?’
My response to that question
will be Yes.
In the event that the
Referendum will declare a Yes
vote the Scottish government has
proposed that Independence Day
will be March 24, 2016 to allow
negotiations with the
Westminster government on the
transition arrangements towards
independence.
May 2016 would then see the
first ever elections to an
independent Scottish Parliament.
This will be the time for political
parties to present their election
manifestos to the electorate.
It is important to understand
that voters are not being asked
on September 2014 to support a
political party or endorse a
political programme.
Neither does it register
support for Alec Salmond and
the SNP Scottish government. I
am not an SNP supporter but
credit to the party in government
for giving us the opportunity to
have our own parliament - to
enshrine the right of all nations
to self determination. A
parliament with all the necessary
powers to make our country
more fair, just and prosperous..
The Scottish government
White Paper - “Scotland’s Future
– Your Guide to an Independent
Scotland” is designed to inform
the voters of the benefits of
independence and explain the
ways of building a stronger
economy and a fairer society.
This comprehensive document
(670 pages and 170,000 words)
describes what an independent
Scotland would look like and
answers a range of questions on
the practicalities of
Independence. It also lays out a
number of policy choices the
SNP will implement if returned
to government in May 2016.
Alec Salmond is quoted as
saying “We do not seek
independence as an end in itself,
but as a means to change
Scotland for the better”.
Welcome as some of their
commitments are such as getting
rid of nuclear weapons,
scrapping the bedroom tax,
protecting the NHS and other
improved social and welfare
provision we must be careful to
ensure that an independent
Scotland would not be forced to
accept all SNP policies.
RMT will also have our
agenda on workers’ rights, repeal
of anti-trade union laws or
transport issues relating to rail
and the ferries and the off-shore
energy industry.
Perhaps the emergence of a
‘new party of labour’ which is
being discussed in the union
currently will emerge to take the
cause forward.
Support for a Yes vote is a far
broader church than the SNP. It
includes Greens, socialists, trade
unionists, members of the
business community, artists,
authors, entertainers, poets and
individuals with no political
affiliation.
There is a coalition of Tories,
Labour and Lib Dems working
for a No vote in Better Together,
engaged in a campaign of
scaremongering, they even refer
to themselves as Project Fear.
Better Together? Successive
Westminster governments have
made us the 4th most unequal
society in the developed world,
the gap between the rich and
poor ever widening, child
poverty, poverty pay, zero hours
contracts, greed and
irresponsibility rewarded
–certainly better for the few.
Here in Scotland there is one
Tory MP and a small number of
Lib Dem Tories. Scottish MPs in
Westminster overwhelmingly
voted against the Bedroom Tax,
welfare cuts, austerity, increased
VAT and postal privatisation, in
other words Scotland opposed,
Westminster imposed. Where is
the democracy? Through
independence we would always
get the government we voted for.
Much is being made of the
finances of an independent
Scotland and the charge that we
cannot stand alone.
We are subjected to
disparaging comments of the
type that Scots are “subsidy
junkies” whereas the truth is that
we get a 9.3 per cent share of
UK public spending and give 9.9
per cent as Scotland’s
contribution to UK taxes.
Even David Cameron said in
2007, “it would be wrong to
suggest that Scotland could not
be another successful
independent country”.
My support for independence
has no basis in nationalism or
xenophobia. I treasure and
support solidarity and
friendships with peoples across
the world.
I have a shared experience of
struggle with many comrades in
my almost 44 years of union
membership and I believe that an
independent Scotland would
have a positive impact on that
struggle because it would
engender a belief that there is an
alternative to the Westminster
consensus.
RMT has rightly commenced a
consultation exercise with our
members in Scotland and I
welcome the opportunity to
engage with them. They will
exercise their democratic right
next year.
But what if the result of the
referendum is No? We would
continue to get Tory
governments we didn’t vote for.
Who believes that the Labour
Party would make any
difference? In other words a
continuation of the Westminster
consensus – how would that help
working people in Scotland or
anywhere else?
In this battle of Project Hope
versus Project Fear, I side with
Hope.
John Milligan
FOR AN
INDEPENDENT SCOTLAND