Searchable article text
wrote to the union setting out
his concerns which had been
raised with ORR in light of the
RMT’s campaign saying that:
“The regulator [ORR] welcomes
Network Rail’s aspiration to
cease the use of zero hour
contracts for any safety critical
staff”.
All well and good you might
think accept that once again the
two-handed role of the ORR, as
both regulator and budget
holder, raises its head with
Network Rail contradicting the
letter to RMT from Mr Burns
with their own plans to reduce
track staff by 800 in the next
control period by …”making
greater use of Tier 2
contractors…”. Yes, those same
zero hours agencies.
So what sort of railway do
we really want if the past 20
years have been a period of
wasted opportunity and
profiteering that has dragged
our industry into the headlines
for all the wrong reasons.
There’s no better starting
point than the policy that polls
show is supported by 70 per
cent of the population – public
ownership. It is the right thing
to do and fiddling around the
edges with madcap schemes like
“fair franchising” and “deep
alliances” is just more of the
same old same old that dragged
us through the mire in the first
place.
So what if we have to take
on the EU over the issue of who
runs and owns our railways?
Why should German and French
state operators be allowed to
keep their fares low by buying
out UK franchises and bleeding
the British passenger for every
penny they can while spineless
politicians from all parties stand
on the side lines claiming that
there’s not a damn thing they
can do about it?
The infamous EU directive
91/440/EEC began the process of
rail privatisation across the EU
when it was introduced on July
29 1991. This directive orders
member states to separate train
operations and rail
infrastructure in order to
dismantle state rail industries in
favour of market competition. It
stipulates:
• Operational autonomy for
railway operators
• Separation of the
infrastructure from operations
in order to create an internal
market
• Open access for international
undertakings
• Introduction of track access
charges
John Major's Conservative
government privatised British
Rail on this model after the
Tories removed Margaret
Thatcher who actually opposed
rail privatisation.
After the Tories kicked
Maggie out like a dog in the
night, the Tories went ahead
and The Railways Regulation
1992, was introduced under
Section 2(2) of the European
Communities Act 1972 in order
to comply with the directive.
There have been three EU rail
packages imposed since then
and a 4th rail package is being
discussed to finally remove all
vestiges of national government
involvement from any
meaningful control of their rail
networks.
This is despite the fact that
electorates have demonstrated
time and again that they want
their railways in public sector
where they belong.
RMT remains committed to
the investment needed to bring
Britain's railways out of the
slow lane, including High Speed,
electrification and the increased
capacity required to meet the
continuing surge in passenger
demand. But High Speed rail
has been delayed by political
wrangling for decades while
other parts of Europe have raced
ahead and all the warning signs
are now flashing that
modernisation is going to be
stalled again as the row
continues.
The truth is that if the profits
and dividends bled out of rail
by privatisation for the last
twenty years had been
reinvested into modernisation
and infrastructure we would
have expanded rail to keep pace
with increasing passenger
numbers.
The nation that gave the
railways to the world is miles
behind other countries through
a generation of political
ineptitude and profiteering with
passengers crammed into
overcrowded services.
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: october 2013 :: RMTnews
11
1957 European Commission
establishes plan for a common
transport market run on the
basis of “free competition” and
the “principles of the market
economy” as written into the
Treaty of Rome.
1965 The Council of Ministers
proposes a common strategy
to “ensure the implementation
of the principles of the market
economy” in transport.
1972 Commission brings sea
transport into the common
strategy to operate on the
“principles of the market
economy”.
1983 European Round Table
of Industrialists (ERT) lobby
group www.ert.be draws up
plans for Trans-European
Transport Networks (TENs)
strategic transport corridors
complete with privatised
railways.
1991 EC introduces rail
directive 91/440/EEC on July
29 1991 demanding the
separation of infrastructure and
operations, open access for
international undertakings and
the introduction of track access
charges.
1993 Tory government
privatises British Rail along the
lines of the EU directive. The
Railways Regulation 1992
introduced under Section 2(2)
of the European Communities
Act 1972 in order to comply
with the directive.
2001 First Railway Package
demands ‘liberalisation’ of EU
rail freight, implemented in
Britain in November 2005
2004 Second Railway
Package demands open
access for all types of rail
freight services by 2006 and
establishes a European Railway
Agency to implement EU
directives.
2007 Third Railway Package
demands ‘liberalisation’ of
passenger rail services
requiring open access in all EU
member states by January 1
2010.
2009 Lisbon Treaty removes
the national veto in over 60
new areas including transport,
transferring decisions to
Qualified Majority Voting (QMV)
allowing member states to be
outvoted.
2012 First Railway Package
‘recast’ to establish a single
European railway area and
outlaws member states from
using the "holding model" to
manage rail infrastructure and
train operations within the
same parent company
2013 European Commission
publishes a Fourth Railway
Package which requires the
compulsory competitive
tendering of all rail services.
TRANSPORT
PRIVATISATION
TIMELINE