Searchable article text
The ‘under occupation penalty’
dubbed by its critics as the
‘bedroom tax’was drawn up by
Lord David Freud, the
government’s welfare ‘reform’
minister.
It is an unfair and unjust
‘punitive measure’ solely against
benefits claimants, deliberately
designed to further impoverish
those who are already
impoverished by the
government’s austerity and
welfare ‘reforms’.
Once again it falls on the
heads of anyone who is
fortunate enough to have to rely
for their survival on the benefits
system and live in either social
housing or privately owned
rented accommodation.
The bedroom tax has been
referred to as a ‘punitive
measure’ against those on
benefits who have a ‘spare’
bedroom in order to force them
to downsize to smaller
accommodation and free up
homes for larger families,
although this does not in fact
extend to home owners who are
in receipt of benefits.
The main reason for this is
because Tory governments
under Margaret Thatcher forced
councils to cease building social
housing and to sell off most of
the stock they already had. This
was because homeowners
tended to vote Conservative and
it led to a shortage of housing
stock. This policy was continued
by New Labour.
Employment minister Chris
Grayling claims that it is
impossible to justify a million
spare bedrooms when there are
so many families living in
temporary accommodation. He
said that spare rooms in council
houses were a ‘luxury’ when so
many children didn’t have a
secure roof over their heads.
However having a spare
bedroom is not a ‘luxury’, it is a
necessity not least for those
who have carers, family
members and children that come
to stay with them on occasions.
Welfare secretary Iain
Duncan Smith claims that it is
not right the some people on
benefits have been able to live
in homes ‘that working people
cannot afford’, which I find a
rather obnoxious and offensive
statement coming from a man
who lives in a two million
pound Tudor farmhouse rent
free because it is owned by his
rich father-in-law the Fifth
Baron of Cottesloe.
From April the bedroom tax,
along with the benefit cap, and
the introduction of the universal
credit and the effect is likely to
be horrendous. Under universal
credit most will be financially
worse off with a reduction in
the level of housing and council
tax benefits.
Imagine a single person on
jobseekers allowance of £57 per
week having to pay out £5
towards council tax, £10
towards rent and then being hit
with a bedroom tax and shelling
out another £10.
The person would have to
live on £32 a week, paying his
bills, fares etc as part of their
job seeking activities and then
find funds for food. I don’t
think it could be done and for
families bringing up children it
is likely to be far worse
especially with the curtailment
of tax credits for families with
more than two children as well.
National Housing Federation
chief executive David Orr said
that the tax punished people for
trying to have a family life in
homes that have lived in for
years.
This is true but the purpose
of the bedroom tax is far more
sinister as it further
impoverishes the poorest in
society, driving them out of
their homes.
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: february 2013 :: RMTnews
26
Tenants, unions and campaigners across
Britain have launched a national fightback
against cuts to housing benefits and
debunking the "strivers vs skivers" myth.
Defend Council Housing is organising with
trade unions, Disabled People Against Cuts
(DPAC) and other campaign and
community groups to co-ordinate action
including mass protests up and down the
country.
The campaign particularly targets benefit
caps and the reduction of council tax
benefits for millions of tenants under the
government's welfare reforms that come
into force this year, including the "bedroom
tax."
From April the under-occupancy tax will
penalise anyone living in social housing
who has a spare bedroom by cutting 14 to
25 per cent off a claimant's housing benefit.
The tax was spearheaded by Tory Lord
David Freud, who The Mirror newspaper
revealed owns an eight-bedroomed
country mansion he uses for holidays and
weekends as well as a four-bedroomed
Highgate town house.
And from October Universal Credit will cut
benefits further for those with disabilities,
households with two earners, mothers and
those paying for childcare.
A national link-up of campaigns, a summit
and action around budget day in March
were all agreed.
DPAC spokesman Andy Greene stressed
the importance of reaching out to the
"silent majority" who "aren't necessarily
political" but who are still affected by the
reforms.
"In all our campaigning we need to engage
with people, spend time to talk to them
and listen carefully to their concerns," he
said.
For more information go to
www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk
SAY NO TO THE BEDROOM TAX
A RMT member warns that the Tories are attacking the poorest in society with plans
to cut welfare benefits this April from those considered to have a spare bedroom
ACTIVISTS LAUNCH
‘BEDROOM TAX' BATTLE