Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: november/december 2012 :: RMTnews
F
irstly I am pleased to report
that the International
Transport Federation (ITF) has
re-launched the international
ratings forum which will be
getting to grips with issues
affecting ratings on ships
around the world. Henrik Berlau
of the Danish shippers union 3F
was elected chair and I was
elected vice-chair.
One of the main issues facing
the union is defending jobs.
Stena Line announced earlier
this year that it wanted to cut
jobs on some of its routes in the
Irish Sea due to the downturn in
passenger and vehicle traffic on
some of the less busy sailings.
Several meetings with myself,
the Stena national port
committee and the company
have taken place and, after
months of speculation, ‘sample
rosters’ were produced. These
so-called rosters, if
implemented, would have
destroyed the whole concept of
time on, time off despite
original assurances that this
would not be the case.
Members were
understandably outraged and
the union was inundated with
requests for a ballot. Although
we produced the matrix and it’s
still a live option, the company
has withdrawn those rosters,
saying "they were never going
to use them, they were purely
for illustration purposes".
As far as the union is
concerned they were
unacceptable, unworkable,
unsafe and shows a complete
disregard for our members. If
they are produced again we will
have no hesitation in balloting
for all out industrial action.
Yes the company has
problems, as does every ferry
operator. RMT is prepared to
examine other options provided
it does not impact on the hard-
earned terms and conditions of
our members.
Amongst the other options
being examined are closing
some outlets on busier periods,
rostering leave in less busier
periods and the possibility of
allowing a limited number of
people to consider voluntary
redundancy.
Similar problems face
another major ferry operator
P&O. There were fears recently
when all trade unions were
summoned to Channel House to
receive this news that lower
capacity on crossings was
having an effect on the
business.
There were no
announcements of job losses
and cuts to terms and
conditions but it’s clear the
company is looking to make
savings wherever possible.
I think all the unions who
attended are committed to
finding solutions provided they
do not impact on terms and
conditions and jobs.
P&O made a lot about the
company's rising pension costs
and commitments and it appears
to me a lot of that blame was
directed towards the new
additional costs to the Merchant
Navy Ratings Pension Fund
(MNRPF) following the recent
court case which P&O lost and
now find themselves having to
find millions to pay back.
But before blaming MNRPF
they need to look at themselves
long and hard, because had they
continued paying their original
amount of contributions they
might not have been in this
situation. That said there are
problems which we as a
responsible union are prepared
to work with the company to
resolve.
NORTHLINK
Members will recall the ballot
we conducted earlier this year
following Serco's acquisition of
the Northern Isles ferry services.
The company gave assurances
that current pension provisions
would be honoured and the
existing machinery including
consultation and negotiation
prior to any changes being
made.
Just months later the
company announced that due to
lower demand it wanted to
reduce its passenger carrying
certificate (PC)which would
allow ships to carry less crew.
The Maritime and Coastguard
Agency(MCA) agreed to this –
funny thing is they always do –
without consulting the union in
any way. RMT will have to work
on this politically to get the
need for them to do so
enshrined in law.
Then Serco announce that
they need 36 less catering staff
(OBS) claiming that this
complies with the safety levels.
However this doesn't meet with
what our members believe to be
acceptable levels of staffing.
Moreover where was the
consultation and negotiation
that was supposed to happen
before changes were to be
made? Therefore the ballot is
back on.
It is clear the ferry sector is
facing a difficult situation as a
result of the under capacity
usage as a result of the
recession. The loss of duty-
freeacross the Channel and the
opening of the tunnel have had
a severe impact. Now if this
useless European Union
legislation on Carbon emissions
is brought into force in the next
couple of years it will have a
devastating effect on the
industry.
FORELAND/BIBBYS
Foreland operates six strategic
RO/RO's for the Ministry of
Defence and it has advised the
management company Bibbys
that the government wants to
sell of two ships as the scaling
down of British armed forces in
many conflict areas continues.
However the full complement
of ships has never been used in
military style operations, two of
them have been gainfully
employed on commercial
charters in the Baltic and they
are now on long-term charters
in the North Sea.
Moreover in the case of
emergencies they are available
to supplement the UK fleet
instead of chartering foreign-
flag ships to move troops and
equipment, so why offer these
for sale?
There are no imminent plans
to make anyone redundant
whilst the ships remain working,
so there is no need to start
negotiations over such matters
and in any case we would be
looking for suitable alternative
employment for our members. If
there any signs of them being
sold we are ready to move.
Finally on pensions, after
lobbying the government
seafarers are now included in
new pension auto-enrolment
requirements. The larger
employers will have to comply
first and the ones with fewer
employees latter. None the less
we have written to all shipping
companies and asked them for
their plans and time tables and
we will keep you all advised
accordingly.
23
SHIPPING
NEWS
National Secretary Steve Todd
deals with issues facing shippers