Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: november/december 2012 :: RMTnews
11
RMT has produced new figures
which show that performance
on the government’s pilot
project for merging private train
operation with infrastructure –
the so-called “deep alliance” on
South West Trains – is in free
fall.
Figures obtained by RMT
show that in the first full month
of the pilot on SWT
performance dropped by 3.7 per
cent and average punctuality on
the six months to September
dropped by 0.6 per cent
compared to the same six
months in 2011 before the “deep
alliance” project was rolled out.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that not only is the
whole franchising system in
chaos but the government’s own
pilot for giving the private
sector a controlling influence on
infrastructure, under the terms
of the McNulty Rail Review, is
in meltdown as well.
“The ‘deep alliance’ was
supposed to improve punctuality
and performance but as these
figures show the opposite is in
fact the case and passengers on
this vital commuter service,
facing fare hikes of up to 11 per
cent in January, can see
standards of service in
meltdown.
“The overwhelming case for
scrapping McNulty and
renationalising the railways is
now staring the Government
smack bang in the face,” he
said.
‘Alliancing’ allows private
train operating companies a
greater say in planning Network
Rail’s work on the infrastructure
– or Railtrack Mark 2 as it
should be more accurately
known.
The government’s Rail
Command Paper gave more
details of this policy. Most
significantly, the requirement on
Network Rail to produce
separate accounts for each
region, signaling the break-up
of Network Rail as a single
body, effectively allowing the
TOCs to include public funds in
their future budgets. As a result,
the return of the dangerous and
disastrous sub-contracting
fiasco of the Railtrack era is just
around the corner.
In an echo of the way
Network Rail’s track access
charges were reduced to
accommodate increased
premium payments from TOCs
to government, alliancing allows
TOCs and FOCs a greater say in
Network Rail’s work and
expenditure at the same time as
the Government is demanding
cuts to the cost of rail services.
It is unlikely that the rail
companies won’t seek to dip
their ladles into the public
money flowing out of Network
Rail.
A deep alliance now exists
between Network Rail and
South West Trains on the
Wessex Line and between
Network Rail and Greater
Anglia. On the Wessex Line,
where an alliance had been
expected for some time, the
deep alliance cost Network Rail
over £1m in consultancy fees to
set up and the punctuality of
South West Trains passenger
services has fallen since the
alliance was introduced in April
this year.
At the same time,
responsibility for implementing
all the pro-private reforms
proposed by McNulty has been
handed to the ‘Rail Delivery
Group’ which is made up of the
larger TOCs and FOCs and
Network Rail, with ATOC also in
attendance. It is obvious that
the TOCs will use this forum to
pressurise Network Rail over,
amongst other things, the
performance of alliances
between them and TOCs,
blaming Network Rail whenever
there are problems. The
formation of the RDG amounts
to the privatisation of rail policy
and the current fiasco over rail
franchising could pale into
insignificance compared to the
potential for chaos from the Rail
Delivery Group’s decisions
which will be driven, first and
foremost, by the commercial
needs of the TOCs and FOCs.
South West Trains has been
lobbying MPs on the ‘deep
alliance’ with Network Rail,
despite a lack of evidence
(beyond the fall in punctuality)
on its performance.
At a recent meeting of the
All-Party Parliamentary Group
on Rail, Tim Shoveller,
managing director of South
West Trains, preached to MPs
about the benefits to the
company, Network Rail and
passengers of the deep alliance.
According to Mr Shoveller,
South West Trains is keen on
using the alliance to foster the
belief amongst SWT staff that
“it’s our railway”. This tells you
all you need to know about the
long term aims of the
government’s alliancing policy –
it is the first major step toward
Railtrack 2: The Sequel.
DEEP ALLIANCING
DOESN’T WORK
Performance standards dip on
“deep alliance” pilot at South
West Trains which allows train
operators control over
infrastructure work as part of the
government’s McNulty rail policy