Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: october 2012 :: RMTnews
22
Two bus drivers threatened with
the sack for being RMT union
reps have won £16,000 in
compensation in from transport
privateer Arriva.
Marcus Farr and Len Graves
were harassed, disciplined and
threatened with the sack by
Arriva because they wore high
visibility vests with the union
logo on.
However other drivers had
worn their own high visibility
vests while on duty without
complaint, including one with a
“Himmler” on the back and one
with his initials shaped into a
swastika on his vest.
The men wore the RMT vests
rather than the company ones to
ensure that members knew who
they were and could come to
them for advice.
The tribunal ordered Arriva
to pay the men compensation,
including aggravated damages
to Mr Graves, and to pay the
union its legal costs.
RMT officials always
considered that Arriva singled
them out because they were
union representatives. London
South Employment Tribunal
agreed, ruling that the reason
the firm did this was to penalise
them for being RMT members
and to deter them from taking
part in RMT activities.
The members, who are based
at South Croydon garage, were
repeatedly pulled up by their
managers for wearing orange
vests with the RMT logo on the
back instead of the Arriva
branded yellow ones on the
basis that this was unauthorised
uniform.
Mr Graves was suspended for
wearing the vest and the stress
of this resulted in him becoming
ill. Arriva managers ordered that
he be paid only statutory sick
pay while he was off sick. When
he complained he was told the
issue could only be resolved if
he agreed to an immediate fact
finding interview about the vest
and agree not to wear one again
which he reluctantly agreed to
and he was subsequently issued
with a disciplinary sanction as
was also the case with Mr Farr.
The members pursued their
claim against Arriva for
subjecting them to detriment on
grounds of trade union
activities, which is against the
law. The tribunal agreed
unanimously that Arriva had
acted unlawfully.
It said: “The purpose of the
acts complained of was to
penalise the claimants for being
members of the RMT and/or to
deter them from taking part in
the activities of the RMT” and
ordered that Mr Farr be paid
£7,000 compensation and Mr
Grave £9,000. An award for
costs was also made against
RMT secured a key milestone
victory in the fight for justice
for sacked Jarvis rail workers
with an Employment Tribunal
finding that there was a transfer
of part of the Jarvis renewals
work on the London North East
work to Babcock Rail under a
contract with Network Rail.
Jarvis PLC went into
administration on March 25.
Jarvis Rail Ltd and Fastline Ltd
went into administration on
March 29. The administrators
sacked about 1,100
Jarvis/Fastline employees on 31
March, including over 400 RMT
members.
The ET hearing in Leeds has
been deciding on whether or not
there was a transfer of that part
of Jarvis Rail Ltd dealing with
the LNE contract renewals work
for Network Rail.
RMT argued that the work
transferred to Network Rail or
Babcock Rail. Babcock Rail
signed a deal with Network Rail
to carry out all of LNE contract
renewals work in May 2010.
The Employment Tribunal
found in RMT’s favour and there
will now be further discussions
and hearings as the union and
its lawyers pursue a fair and just
settlement for the sacked Jarvis
workers.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that the union had
secured an important landmark
victory for the sacked Jarvis
workers.
JUSTICE FOR SACKED JARVIS RAIL
LANDMARK LEGAL VICTORY
AGAINST VICTIMISATION
Employment tribunal rules that
company unlawfully discriminated
against two workers because of their
RMT membership