Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: may/june 2012 :: RMTnews
18
A
t last year’s RMT national
women’s conference a
resolution was passed on the
topic of women against the cuts.
This called for support for
Merseyside Women Against the
Cuts and London Women Against
the Cuts, along with raising
awareness about these campaigns
and the TUC briefing on this topic
within the union.
The TUC also produced a
briefing titled 'The gender impact
of the cuts' which outlined the
impact that cuts to jobs, services
and welfare would have on
women.
At the time of writing many of
the cuts were yet to take effect.
However, even at that early stage
it was already apparent that the
government's deficit-reduction
strategy would disproportionately
disadvantage women and
families, particularly those on low
incomes.
The TUC updated this briefing
recently giving an overview of
the ways in which women in both
the public and private sectors
have been affected by the public
sector cuts, as workers, as
benefits claimants and as service
users.
This comprehensive briefing is
in the women’s section on the
RMT website. In summary it
shows how the government’s
attacks on the public sector are
having a disproportionate and
disastrous effect on women in
three main ways:
• More women will lose their
jobs simply due to the fact that
significantly more women than
men are employed in the
public sector
• Women are more reliant on the
services than the public sector
provides and therefore stand to
lose more from cuts to services
• Women are more likely to
depend on the welfare system
and will be hit hard by cuts to
benefits.
The topic of the gender impact
of the cuts was taken forward at
this year’s conference. The TUC
briefing of the impact of the cuts
was given to the delegates and
breakout groups pooled their
experiences and knowledge of
what was happening in their
areas. RMT delegation leader to
the TUC women’s conference
Tracy Darker noted the examples
delegates were sharing and took
them to the conference to be
included in their mapping
exercise. Besides the cut back in
child tax benefits and increases in
unemployment which were
universal, local examples included
the closure of children’s play
areas, citizen advice bureaus and
libraries.
In addition, a request for examples on
the global recession within the
transport industry had been received
from the International Transport
Workers Federation.
Again delegates pooled their
experiences which have been fed back
to the ITF. Should any member wish
to send in any evidence regarding the
real experience of the cut backs,
please do contact the Equal
Opportunities Officer,
j.webb@rmt.org.uk. Oxfam - A
Gender Perspective on Welfare
Reform.
WOMEN AGAINST
THE CUTS
RMT equality officer Jess
Webb reports on the effect of
government cuts on the lives
of working women
Many campaign groups, charities, community
groups, and NGOs have also published responses
to government policies. A selection of these can be
found at the following websites:
The Fawcett Society
www.fawcettsociety.org.uk
Women’s budget group
www.wbg.org.uk/
Working Families
Comprehensive Spending Review:
The Impact on Working Families
www.workingfamilies.org.uk/articles/pdf/article/341
Child Poverty Action Group
“Research commissioned by the
TUC shows that female lone
parents will lose 18.5 per cent of
their net income”