Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: april 2012 :: RMTnews
15
RMT is in dispute with First
Great Western over the
company’s attempt to
undermine the safety role of the
guard on Class 180 trains being
re-introduced on the franchise.
FGW has used a variety of
excuses to avoid restoring full
guard control over the 180s’
doors – despite the very same
trains being operated by
Northern for two years with the
guard fully in control.
First Great Western initially
tried to maintain the fiction that
modification of the trains to
give the guard full control of
the operation of doors was all-
but impossible.
Yet the five sets that FGW
intends to re-introduce on its
franchise were modified in just
such a manner before they were
transferred to the former
Northern franchise.
The Northern company
council had made it plain that
the 180s would not be allowed
into service there unless the
guard had full control over the
doors – and the necessary
modification was speedily made.
While the 180s were in use
on Northern guards used a local
door on short platforms, but
before their return to FGW, the
simple modification was
inexplicably reversed.
The union understands that a
switching mechanism is already
wired into the 180s that would
make modification to give
selective-door operation to the
guard the matter of a single
weekend’s work.
The company tried to assure
the union that the 180s would
‘only’ be used on the Thames
Valley line, but it has already
made clear that they would be
used in place of high-speed
trains if there were to be a
shortage. Indeed, the sets were
used as subs for HSTs before
they went to Northern.
The company is claiming that
the modification demanded by
the union would not be allowed
by the Rail Safety and
Standards Board (RSSB) but has
not explained why Northern was
“allowed” to do just that.
“RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that it was a case of
First Great Western using the
180s as the thin end of the
wedge to undermine the safety
role of the guard ahead of the
introduction of new intercity
express stock.
“Our members will not be
hoodwinked, it is a clear attack
on safety standards and RMT
will support them all the way in
stopping it,” he said.
the casualisation of the industry
and the use of agency staff will
be a lever to launch inevitable
attacks on members’ terms and
conditions to drive down costs
and increase private profit.
Pat revealed that Rail
Gourmet does not provide
facilities for staff to take
adequate breaks as there is
nowhere secure for their trollies
to be locked away.
As staff are held liable for
any thefts, any losses incurred
have to be reimbursed to the
company from their own
pockets.
Council of Executives
member Owen Herbert spoke on
behalf of the EC and welcomed
the fact that there were so
many new faces at the
conference.
Owen spoke about the work
Brian Whitehead had done to
secure a recognition agreement
with Rail Gourmet and how,
despite this, it had instructed
managers not to let RMT on
site.
“This just goes to
demonstrate the reputation RMT
has for representing its
members,” he said.
Owen spoke of the need for
workplace unity.
“Workers are facing attacks
from bosses, politicians and the
media so it is vital that
everyone sticks together.
“If there is no foundation at
work level we cannot represent
our members” he said.
Asked from the floor if the
union should routinely be
asking employers to bring
cleaning and catering staff back
in-house as part of pay
negotiations, Owen agreed,
adding that RMT was
constantly campaigning for the
entire rail industry to be
brought back together under
one publicly owned umbrella
organisation.
Resolutions brought
passionate speeches from the
floor for support in fighting
attacks on workers’ rights by
the train operating companies.
Motions selected to go
forward to this year’s AGM
included one proposed by
Paddington No 1 branch
attacking the erosion of the
travelling chef service due to a
shortage of staff and a
preference for providing only a
trolley service was.
The motion called for the
restoration of the service leader
role and this view was widely
supported. It was proposed that
evidence should be compiled
documenting examples of the
service being cancelled so a
compelling case can be
presented to employers.
The second resolution to be
put to the AGM came from
Manchester South branch,
demanding that all train
operating companies supplied
in-house staff to provide on-
board catering as a pre-
requisite of any future
tendering for rail franchises.
Next year’s conference iwill
take place in Weston-Super-
Mare on March 1 to 3.
DEFENDING THE
SAFETY ROLE OF
THE GUARD
Battle lines drawn
on First Great
Western over
180 stock