Searchable article text
JOBS BATTLE AT DFDS
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: march 2012 :: RMTnews
10
S
trict new pollution controls
will cost thousands of British
shipping jobs, force ferry fares
to rise by a fifth and may even
drive operators out of business,
MPs have been told.
The UK maritime industry
has warned that ports including
Newcastle, Hull, Harwich,
Teesport and Rosyth would be
particularly badly hit by tougher
limits on sulphur emissions in
the North Sea.
Ferry companies said their
fuel bills would rise by tens of
millions of pounds a year,
resulting in passenger fare
increases of 20 per cent, fewer
services and job losses.
They also claimed that more
traffic would be transferred to
the roads and higher freight
costs would mean higher import
costs.
The so-called Annex VI
controls, to come into force
from 2015, are backed by the
British government as part of an
international convention revised
in 2008.
The European Commission
wants to bring the regulations
into European Union law, but
with additional requirements -
resisted by the UK - for
passenger ferries to observe the
limits even when they are
outside special emission control
areas.
The Commons Transport
Select Committee supported the
government, saying the costs of
tighter controls would be
outweighed by the health
benefits, estimated at £1.1
billion a year from 2020.
But it urged the government
to block the EC’s ‘gold-plating’
of the regulations with the
additional restrictions on
passenger ferries.
``These regulations will
impose significant costs on
operators, and we therefore
agree that the Commission
should impose no additional
burdens on operators at this
time over and above the
requirements of Annex VI,” it
said.
Maritime UK, which
represents shipping and ports,
said the regulations would cost
jobs.
Vice chairman Lars Olsson
told the committee the
regulations would place an
additional financial burden of
R
MT is in talks with DFDS Seaways over
the implementation of a scheme called
Project Light Crossing, designed to cut costs
and jobs in Dover.
The plan has sparked anger among
workers, while industry experts claim it will
mean dangerously low numbers of deck
hands on DFDS ships, which operate in the
world's busiest seaway.
A total of 18 jobs in DFDS's deck
department have been earmarked for the axe
and RMT is fighting to keep those
employees.
RMT members are taking part in a vote
over possible strike action in protest.
A letter has been sent to all deck ratings
by shipping EC member Malcolm Dunning
"DFDS are considering a counter-
proposal from RMT attempting to retain six
jobs. However, DFDS would want you to
agree to a pay freeze for 2012 to finance the
retention of these jobs.
"This is your call now and so I have
attached a referendum ballot paper asking a
simple question.
"This exercise needs to establish your, the
members', position so that RMT can reflect
your views and if necessary prepare an
official ballot for industrial action,” the
letter says.
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency has
urged the operator to provide adequate shift
patterns and break rotas for those staff left
on board but a source involved with the
Light Crossing project said: "At a time when
the 25th anniversary of the Herald of Free
Enterprise is in everyone's thoughts, this
decision to reduce deck departments is
worrying.
"Some people in the port, who have been
in the industry for more than 40 years, have
said if this goes through, levels of personnel
in the deck department will be the lowest
they have ever seen," the source said.
EU THREATENS THOUSANDS
OF SHIPPING JOBS