Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: february 2012 :: RMTnews
23
industry.
Due to the persistence of the local
RMT branch and the active
campaigning by some of who were
injured, the union pushed for Network
Rail’s Safe Plant Working Group
(SPWG) to set up a group to look at
the issue.
The group first met in March 2008
considered an analysis of runaway
incidents and sought to establish
common causes and possible
solutions. The group then considered
what the rail industry had done post-
Tebay to protect workers.
The group believed that up to 20
per cent of the runaway incidents
analysed could have been prevented
by some type of secondary protection.
Finally a paper was presented on
available forms of secondary
protection, their design, uses,
advantages and associated risks.
Network Rail agreed to source a
company that could manufacture an
item of equipment that would provide
additional secondary protection to
workers.
The first trials of the treadle (see
picture) demonstrated that it could
provide a 12-second warning of
runaways to track workers yet a year
passed and little progress had been
made.
Further trials proved successful but
little progress was made. By the end
of last year Network Rail finally
promised the equipment would be
delivered to an agreed timetable.
RMT general secretary Bob Crow
has now written to Network Rail to
demand that the company stops
prevaricating and gives a definitive
timetable for the guaranteed
introduction of the secondary
protection system.
“I know, from press reports, that
the money originally allocated for
Director’s bonuses is being considered
for safety projects.
“Perhaps if this money was
channelled into this project my
members would begin to recognise the
absolute commitment to safety which
I believe you hold.
“The company’s other programmes
will not do what secondary protection
will do, which is to give track workers
one last chance to escape with their
lives should all the other systems fail.
“One last chance is all we are
asking for; you have it in your power
to give them that last chance,” he
said.
President’s column
INVEST IN SAFE
PUBLIC
TRANSPORT
We mark the eighth anniversary of the
Tebay rail disaster, where RMT
members Colin Buckley, Darren
Burgess, Chris Waters and Gary Tindall
lost their lives.
On 15 February 2004, a 16-tonne,
steel-laden, railway trolley - its
hydraulic brakes disabled by a sub-
contractor to avoid the expense of
maintaining them - ran away into the
darkness at Shap summit, the highest
point on Britain’s railway. Three miles
later it ploughed through a work gang
killing four men outright and leaving five
physically and psychologically
traumatised.
Eight years on RMT members are
asking, where is the secondary
protection and warning systems that
could have saved our members that
night? Mandatory secondary
protection on Network Rail
infrastructure is still not a reality.
At a Lancaster Trades Council meeting
last year, a retired RMT member told
me: “we support NHS staff, council
workers and teachers fighting for their
pensions, but we have unfinished
business with Network Rail over
secondary protection that we can’t
forget”.
RMT’s Lancaster branch organised a
commemoration event at the memorial
south of Tebay village attended by
assistant general secretary Mick Cash,
RMT executive member Kevin Morrison,
regional organisers Andy Warnock-
Smith, John MacDonald and Craig
Johnston and RMT members and their
families including Tom Angus who was
amongst those on duty at Tebay in
2004.
As Bob Crow has said, Network Rail
must stop prevaricating and give us a
definitive timetable for the guaranteed
introduction of secondary protection.
After Tebay, Network Rail introduced
'slippers' (scotches to inhibit wheel
movement on a gradient), which it
discontinued due to concerns about
passenger train derailments from
'slippers' left on the line.
RMT’s 2007 AGM backed the
campaign for secondary protection led
by Tom Angus and Lancaster Branch.
In January 2008, RMT pressure on
Network Rail revealed 20% of runaway
vehicles are uncontrolled by any
secondary protection.
In August 2008 the first ‘rear guard’
prototype was demonstrated at
Shrewsbury and trials took place in
May 2009.
In March 2010 a further trial was
commissioned on a South Devon
heritage railway and in January 2011
testing on the mainline at Newton
Abbot proved the device works.
In November 2011 Network Rail
promised deployment before the 8th
anniversary of Tebay in February 2012.
That promise blatantly wasn’t kept and
questions are being asked over
Network Rail’s commitment to the
project.
RMT’s National Health and Safety
Conference this month in Doncaster will
hear members’ safety concerns with
renewed urgency.
This month a Parliamentary group on
Occupational Safety and Health
described lethal dust fibres in schools
as a “national scandal”, warning 75 per
cent of schools expose children,
teachers and other staff to carcinogens.
Over 140 teachers died from the rare
asbestos-related cancer, mesothelioma
in the past 10 years.
The Health and Safety Executive
reports asbestos causes 4,000 work-
related deaths in the UK every year.
The prevalence of asbestos throughout
transport and energy industries is well
known. Not only was asbestos the fire
retardant of choice in building materials,
its use was endemic in train and
shipbuilding for lagging and insulation.
As aging structures deteriorate, workers
and passengers are increasingly
exposed to the risk of inhaling these
deadly fibres.
This all demonstrates the need for a
National Transport Plan to renew,
refurbish and rebuild Britain’s transport
infrastructure safely and with proper
environmental and social planning.
This would be an essential tool to
create skilled, union jobs of great
benefit to society now and in the future.
Unfortunately, the current Con Dem
coalition government is making £9
billion of cuts to public transport
spending and the Labour opposition
confirms that it will keep £6 billion of
these.
RMT will continue to put forward the
alternative for public investment in a
fully renationalised, publicly controlled
transport network.
Alex Gordon