Searchable article text
LEGAL
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: november/december 2011 :: RMTnews
21
Rail workers and seafarers with the
asbestos-related condition pleural
plaques face a postcode lottery for
compensation after the Supreme
Court ruled that the Scottish
parliament and the Northern
Ireland Assembly had the right to
pass laws for the benefit of their
citizens.
People in England and Wales
diagnosed with the same condition
continue to be unable to pursue
compensation against their former
employers.
The welcome decision by the
UK’s highest court was made in
response to a challenge by the
insurance industry to the
lawfulness of an Act of the
Scottish parliament – The Damages
(Asbestos-related Conditions)
(Scotland) Act 2009.
The Act was passed in order to
reverse the decision of the House
of Lords in 2007, in a case called
Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating
Co Ltd, to end compensation for
pleural plaques - a scarring of the
lining of the lungs caused by
exposure to asbestos.
Pleural plaques seldom cause
any physical symptoms. However
they represent irreversible
structural damage to the lungs.
Someone diagnosed with plaques
will, understandably, suffer anxiety
due to the increased risk of going
on to develop a more serious or
fatal asbestos related condition.
Many workers in the rail
industry will have known
colleagues who died from
mesothelioma, the cancer of the
lining of the lung caused by
asbestos.
It was accepted by the courts
for 20 years, until challenged by
insurers, that pleural plaques did
constitute personal injury which
should be compensated. The
insurers’ motivation was of course
to save billions by preventing tens
of thousands of people with
plaques from making claims
against negligent employers.
The Law Lords agreed with the
insurers that the presence of
pleural plaques did not constitute
an injury which could gave rise to
a claim. The right of pleural
plaques sufferers throughout the
UK to pursue compensation was
ended.
Holyrood acted swiftly to
restore the right to compensation
for Scottish citizens. The effect of
its Act was to declare that pleural
plaques are a personal injury for
the purposes of a claim for
damages.
The Northern Ireland Assembly
took the same approach and
passed a similar Act earlier this
year.
In unanimously rejecting the
insurers’ appeal, the Supreme
Court delivered a ringing
endorsement of the legislation in
Scotland (and Northern Ireland).
The insurers, Axa, Royal Sun
Alliance, Zurich and Aviva,
claimed the legislation was
incompatible with the European
Convention of Human Rights and
so was outside the legislative
competence of the Scottish
Parliament. They also said that it
was an “unreasonable, irrational
and arbitrary” exercise of the
legislative authority of the Scottish
Parliament.
But the court accepted that the
legislation served a legitimate
social policy aim and was a
proportionate means of achieving
it. It also accepted that Scottish
pleural plaques sufferers who were
directly affected by the insurers’
legal challenge had a right to
object to it.
This decision recognises the
democratic right of the Scottish
parliament to legislate for the
benefit of its citizens. In Scotland
the rights of people with pleural
plaques are more important than
the commercial interests of
insurers, which is how it ought to
be.
The failure of the Westminster
government to act leaves it
isolated.
Only the discredited arguments
of insurers and politicians could
attempt to justify why people in
Scotland and Northern Ireland
whose lungs have been damaged
by asbestos are entitled to
compensation while those
suffering from the same condition
in England and Wales are left
without a remedy.
POSTCODE LOTTERY OF
ASBESTOS COMPENSATION
Ian McFall, head of asbestos policy at Thompsons Solicitors, looks at
the implications of a recent Supreme Court ruling