Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: october 2011 :: RMTnews
5
R
MT is balloting tube drivers
for action short of a strike
in a dispute over safety.
The ballot is over four
particular aspects of London
Underground’s Operational
Effectiveness Programme which
are unacceptable and potentially
dangerous.
LUL has introduced new
‘sensitive-edge’ procedures’ on
the S stock on the sub-surface
lines, despite the objections of
drivers and health and safety
representatives to the overriding
of current failsafe systems.
Management wants to
remove the inbuilt function
which stops a train if an object
is caught in the door. The
changes would allow the driver
to over-ride the sensitive edge
technology and proceed after
just a visual check. Coupled
with the planned reduction of
station staff, the dangers are
compounded and any accidents
would immediately be blamed
on the driver.
The proposed new procedures
for reversing a train would
allow a driver to reverse a train
from a forward driving position
without any assistance. This
would increase the risk to staff
and passengers and does not
comply with the ALARP “(as
low as reasonably practicable)
established safety principle. The
issue of ‘platform re-
categorisation’ involves ordering
drivers to ‘self dispatch’ as a
consequence of the massive
reductions in platform-based
staff and takes no account of
the serious faults already
uncovered by RMT in the
platform camera system. The
union considers this a recipe for
accidents and injuries to
passengers.
Plans to carrying passengers
over a shunt signal would delay
the movement of the train
service and potentially holding
people in tunnel sections for
longer than necessary.
London underground is now
unilaterally imposing
Operational Standards Notice
(OSN) 101 to bulldoze through
these measures against the
objections of union
representatives.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that the union was
demanding an end to the
reckless policy of expecting
drivers to override door failsafe
systems after a potentially fatal
incident in which a passenger
jumped from a moving train
and another was caught in its
open doors.
“Along with the ‘sensitive
edge’ procedures, a bunch of
other unsafe procedures are
being bulldozed through in the
dash for cuts, and to cover up
the impact of reductions in
station staff, under the guise of
“operational effectiveness”.
“It is our members who have
to deal with the consequences of
these ill-conceived policies.
“We have tried to get LUL to
see sense, but they have
continued to put cash and job
cuts ahead of passenger safety
and we now have no choice but
to ballot for action to stop these
dangerous proposals being
imposed without agreement,” he
said.
TUBE DRIVERS BALLOTED
OVER TUBE TRAIN SAFETY