Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: july/august 2011 :: RMTnews
10
R
MT Parliamentary convenor
John McDonnell MP has
successfully objected to the TFL
London Local Authorities Bill at
Second Reading - specifically on
the grounds that it would lead
to the continued proliferation of
unlicensed, unsafe rickshaws
clogging up central London
The RMT Parliamentary
group objection means that the
Bill will have to be presented
again for second reading on
September 6 at which point
RMT will keep objecting until
the final debate on the Bill is
given.
The union intends to use this
breathing space to force TFL to
negotiate on the revised content
of the Bill and to take tough
action against the unsafe and
unlicensed spread of rickshaws.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that the union’s taxi
branch members didn't want the
rickshaws as they see them as
unsafe, increasing congestion
and with no check on who is fit
and proper to operate them.
"If John McDonnell hadn't
taken the decisive action on
behalf of RMT taxi drivers to get
this Bill knocked back it would
have had dire consequences for
passenger safety.
"The clauses that TFL were
trying to bulldoze through made
little or no provision for any
statutory minimum standards to
be applied or for any checks to
be carried out on the rickshaws,
their riders, or their operators.
“Nor would there have been
any provisions for any training
to be required or for compulsory
registration.
"It is shocking that TFL have
refused to negotiate on this
issue and that instead they are
ignoring the recommendation of
previous Parliamentary
Committees that a compulsory
registration scheme for
rickshaws/pedicabs should be
explored.
“RMT and our MPs will
continue to fight on this issue to
defend the licensed taxi trade
against this attack on their
livelihoods," Bob said.
R
MT Parliamentary group
convener John McDonnell
MP has been pursuing the
issue of security and
monitoring equipment on
buses with some success after
the union failed to get
adequate responses from
VOSA and the Department for
Transport.
The union has now
established that there is no
legal requirement to have a
periscope on a bus. The only
relevant requirement is
regulation 33 of the Public
Service Vehicles (Conditions
of Fitness, Equipment, Use
and Certification) Regulations
1981 (SI 1981/257) which
states that: “Except in the
case of a vehicle which has a
seating capacity not
exceeding 12 passengers,
adequate means shall be
provided in every vehicle to
enable passengers on any
deck to signal the driver”.
This could be a periscope,
CCTV or another device.
There is also no
requirement for buses to be
fitted with CCTV, although in
London all buses must have
CCTV as it is Transport for
London specification to
qualify for route bidding.
Buses must have
windscreen wipers under
Regulation 34 of the Road
Vehicles (Construction and
Use) Regulations 1986 (SI
1986/1078) which states that:
“Every vehicle fitted with a
windscreen shall, unless the
driver can obtain an adequate
view to the front of the
vehicle without looking
through the windscreen, be
fitted with one or more
automatic windscreen wipers
capable of clearing the
windscreen so that the driver
has an adequate view of the
road in front of both sides of
the vehicle and to the front of
the vehicle”.
Buses must be fitted with
speedometers under
Regulation 35 of the 1986
Regs: “Every motor vehicle
shall be fitted with a
speedometer which, if the
vehicle is first used on or
after 1st April 1984, shall be
capable of indicating speed in
both miles per hour and
kilometres per hour, either
simultaneously, or by the
operation of a switch”.
Any statutory requirement
depends upon the equipment
and in some cases upon
contractual fulfilment. RMT’s
Parliamentary group has
secured a meeting with the
Bus Minister, Norman Baker
where this matter will be on
the agenda. It would be
beneficial if the union could
present some evidence of
where these weak regulations
have caused practical
problems for our drivers.
Please email any
information you have of
instances where equipment is
installed but not working
properly and/or where there
have been breaches of the
regulations. You can email in
confidence as your name and
your employer are not
required for this evidence
gathering. Please email
s.mackay@rmt.org.uk.
CALLING
BUS
WORKERS
NO TO UNSAFE
RICKSHAWS
CLOGGING UP
CENTRAL LONDON
CONGESTION:
Rickshaw
drivers clog
bus lanes