Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 376 3706 :: may 2011 :: RMTnews
31
Despite RMT objections, many
employers that operate pension
schemes for employees have
introduced salary sacrifice
arrangements as a way of
reducing National Insurance
Contributions (NIC).
Whilst staff are promised
lower NIC contribution, which
marginally increases their take-
home salary, employers are the
real winners when it comes to
these savings.
Salary sacrifice schemes have
a number of aliases including
PaySave or Smart Pensions, and
these arrangements allow
employees and employers to
save NIC on their pension
payments. They work by
reducing each individual’s
salary by the amount of their
contribution of their pension
scheme; thus the employee’s pay
is lower and NIC are reduced
accordingly.
The NIC rates for 2011/12 for
employees is 12 per cent or 10.4
per cent for those who are
contributing members of a
pension scheme which is
contracted-out of the State
Second Pension. An employee
earning £27,000 and making
pension contributions of seven
per cent will save less than £5 a
week. However, employers’
savings are potentially much
greater.
NIC rates for 2011/12 for
employers are 13.8 per cent, and
for employers who operate a
pension scheme which is
contracted-out the NIC rate is
10.1 per cent. For every
employee who agrees to
participate in a salary sacrifice
arrangement there is a potential
saving to the employer of up to
13.8 per cent on their gross
salary. It goes without saying
that this saving is worth a lot
more than £5 a week to the
employer.
Participation in salary
sacrifice should not affect other
terms and conditions of
employment; however, in
certain circumstances, such as
those on low incomes, it can
affect entitlements to state
benefits such as the Basic State
Pension, Jobseekers Allowance,
Incapacity Benefit, Maternity
Allowance and Bereavement
Benefits.
This is because the reduction
in salary would take earnings
below the Lower Earning Limit,
currently £102 per week for
2011-12, which would reduce
the build up of entitlements to
these benefits.
RMT policy is opposed to
salary sacrifice schemes as these
arrangements effectively reduce
the value of NIC collected by
the Treasury, which are, of
course, used to fund the
National Health Service and
State Pensions.
RMT believes that where
salary schemes are introduced
all savings should be paid into
the employer’s pension scheme
to improve the funding position
and reduce contribution levels.
This is particularly essential
where company pension
schemes are in deficit. It is the
union’s experience that where
employers have made extra
revenue, this profit has not been
put back into the pension
scheme.
RMT is also totally against
employees being automatically
opted-in to such schemes.
Management should not assume
that employees wish to
participate because they will
slightly increase their salary. It
is clear that many employers are
automatically enrolling
employees in so that they can
cream off the significantly
higher financial gains from
salary sacrifice. As a result RMT
has campaigned actively to
encourage workers to opt-out by
sending them individual RMT
opt-out forms to be sent to their
employer.
The union will continue to
organise and campaign against
employers who intend to
introduce salary sacrifice as a
way of inflating their profit
margins at expense of state
benefits and members’ future
pension entitlement.
Many employers that operate
pension schemes are introducing
salary sacrifice arrangements to
inflate profit margins
BEWARE SALARY SACRIFICE