Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 3763706 :: march 2008 :: RMTnews
5
The union briefed MPs earlier in
advance of the special
parliamentary debate on the
future of the London
Underground PPP earlier this
month following the collapse of
Metronet which left the tax
payer with a bill of at least
£1.7billion.
The debate had been called
in response to the Transport
Select Committee’s highly
critical report of the PPP. The
report was critical of the fact
that, under PPP, the government
guaranteed the money Metronet
had borrowed from the banks
which have simply asked for
their money back.
In a briefing circulated to
MPs, RMT warned that
taxpayers also remain exposed
to an unacceptable level of
financial risk and could face
another ten-figure bill if the
remaining PPP company,
Tubelines, were to go out of
business.
The union welcomed the
motion tabled by John
McDonnell MP to coincide with
the debate which argued that
“to safeguard the future interest
of the taxpayer the government
must take steps to bring the
Tubelines contract under the
control of London
Underground”.
The call by the union’s
parliamentary group chair was
picked up by colleagues in the
debate. RMT parliamentary
group member David Taylor MP
asked the transport minister
Ruth Kelly whether “there is a
serious risk that, at some time in
the short to medium term,
Tubelines will go the same way
as Metronet?
“Does she agree that the way
of avoiding the catastrophic
costs and impact on the public
is to take Tube Lines back in-
house as soon as possible so
that its shareholders cannot
meander quietly into the
darkness of a tunnel to pocket
their profits while we taxpayers
have to underwrite their
incompetence and veracity?”
RMT group member Kelvin
Hopkins MP agreed, arguing
that “when it comes to vital
national institutions such as our
railway system and the
transport system for our capital,
risk is never transferred and it is
always ultimately with the
government”.
Harry Cohen MP quoted RMT
concerns about future delays to
upgrades as a result of the
Metronet collapse.
“When the difficult and
expensive work comes up in
later years of the 30-year
contract, Tube Lines will walk
away.
“This division between the
maintenance and infrastructure,
and the operation of the London
Underground did not make any
sense at the time and certainly
makes no sense now. We cannot
give any more blank cheques to
private consortiums,” he said.
In response, the government
claimed that the collapse of
Metronet was due to a corporate
failure of Metronet rather than
the fault of the PPP.
Ruth Kelly also rejected a call
from the Transport Select
Committee for an investigation
into the Metronet affair.
However, a major criminal
investigation is under way amid
evidence that a Metronet
manager awarded vital Tube
refurbishment contracts to a
company with whom he had
close business links.
Huge contracts for complex,
safety-critical electrical, fire
alarm and refurbishment work
at Oxford Circus were handed to
Lanes Group Plc, whose main
expertise is unblocking drains.
Graham Stringer MP also
said the relationship between
Metronet and its subsidiary
Trans4m, which was paid by
Metronet to carry out station
renovations and was owned by
Metronet shareholders, "looks
like real corruption".
MPS WARNED TUBE
LINES COULD GO
WAY OF METRONET
RMT warns MPs that PPP
consortium Tube Lines
could collapse in the same
way Metronet did, leaving
the taxpayer with another
huge bill