Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 3763706 :: january 2008 :: RMTnews
11
I
n 1948 the Labour
government nationalised the
railways merging the four
regional private companies and
created British Rail.
This was the single biggest
change to the industry since
1921 when the 121 private
companies operating the
railways were merged into four
regional private companies,
Great Western, Southern,
London North Western, and
London North Eastern.
As a result of the creation of
one employer the unions and
management sought to
harmonise all the different
arrangements, terms and
conditions covering all the
former private companies.
One bargaining arrangement
was created which eventually
was updated in 1956 to become
the Machinery of Negotiation.
This lasted until 1992 when in
preparation for privatisation
British Rail replaced it with the
1992 procedures.
PTR & R
Work started on a single
Promotion, Transfer,
Redundancy and Resettlement,
arrangements known as the PTR
& R.
After four years of hard
bargaining in 1952 talks on a
new PTR&R arrangement
covering all grades were
completed. This agreement has
been regularly updated and is
still in force for many rail
workers today. Ever since
privatisation employers have
tried to attack this agreement
because of its costs and the
rights it gives to rail workers.
The PTR&R is a collective
agreement covering all workers
which protects an individual
worker when he or she is
promoted, reorganised or made
redundant. That individual has
the right to be treated fairly,
given an equal opportunity and
has a choice based on the
individuals rights not on a
manager’s whim.
So called modern agreements
like the Network Rail’s people
process gives the management a
greater power in deciding what
happens to an individual. The
PTR&R gives the individual a
greater say in what happens to
them. Modern management
arrangements as well giving the
employer more say also happen
to be cheaper.
EXPERIENCE
In addition to ensuring fairness,
opportunity and choice the
creators of the PTR&R, both
management and unions, sought
to reward experience and
loyalty. This was achieved by
making length of service in the
form of seniority important
factors.
Today the PTR&R is under
attack again, the real reason is
it costs too much and gives
individuals to many rights,
which employers hate. By using
the cover of the recent age
discrimination legislation
employers are seeking to throw
out the existing arrangements
and put less favourable
arrangements in place.
This agreement has stood the
test of time and has protected
many rail workers of all ages
since 1952. That in itself
justifies our forefather’s faith in
principles such as seniority.
The agreement is 55 years
old, but age should not matter.
What should matter are the
principles, aims and objectives
contained in the PTR&R.
RMT is all in favour of
updating the arrangements, as
we have done in the past.
The union has no hidden
agenda and believes that
experience and loyalty should
still be rewarded. We only wish
the same could be said of the
employers.
UNDERSTANDING PROMOTION,
TRANSFER, REDUNDANCY AND
RESETTLEMENT (PTR&R)
ARRANGEMENTS
Mick Cash explains PTR&R
arrangements and why they are so
important for every worker today
and should be protected