Searchable article text
RMT helpline 0800 3763706 :: november 2007 :: RMTnews
21
The union has won £80,000
compensation for member who
suffered a back injury as a
result of unloading cargo from a
Caledonian Macbrayne Ferry.
The member had been
expected to move a barrel
weighing 200kg in clear breach
of the Manual Handling
Operation Regulations. Whilst
liability was never an issue, the
company claimed that the
member was partly to blame.
Four months after the
accident, the member suffered a
disc prolapse and the company
denied that the injury was
caused by the accident.
Five specialist consultant
orthopaedic surgeons were
instructed by both sides but the
company settled the claim
before the hearing.
David Wilson, the Scottish
RMT lawyer, said that Disc
prolapse cases were often
extremely difficult to win.
“However, thanks to the
union we were able to instruct
the best experts both on Manual
Handling on board ships and
medical causation," he said.
RMT has secured £6,000
compensation for a member in
Kent whose hearing was
damaged while working at
Bombardier Transportation UK
Ltd.
William Wilkinson was not
supplied with hearing protection
until after the damage was
done. His claim was handled by
RMT law firm Thompsons
Solicitors.
Mr Wilkinson, who worked
for Bombardier Transportation
UK Ltd from 1989 to 2002,
secured £6,000 after it emerged
that he was not supplied with
hearing protection until 2002.
William Wilkinson suffered a
deterioration in hearing and has
trouble hearing conversations
with people.
“I’ve also been told that my
hearing will deteriorate with
time and that in due course I
will need the assistance of
hearing aids,” he said.
RMT general secretary Bob
Crow said that members face
many hazards in the course of
their work but noise is one
where simple protective
equipment can protect them
from injury.
“William Wilkinson is one of
many rail workers to suffer
hearing loss as a result of the
failure of his employer to
provide that protection.
“We would urge other
members to come forward if
they have experienced similar
hearing problems as a result of
noise at work,” he said.
Vincent Reynolds from
Thompsons Solicitors warned
that noise remained one of the
most underestimated workplace
risks.
“It is important that where
someone believes that they may
have sustained hearing damage
at work that they seek legal
advice as soon as possible.
He said that members will
only have three years from the
date of injury or the date that
they knew of the injury to bring
a claim.
“Time is, therefore, of the
essence,” he said.
The union won £50,000 compensation for a
signal worker based in the Highlands after
he suffered a significant back injury at
work.
First Engineering had been carrying out
repairs to the signal box in which the
member was engaged at work.
As part of the renovations, First
Engineering removed the stairs to the signal
box.
During the course of her shift the
member required to leave the box to issue
instructions to a fellow worker.
Unfortunately, she had forgotten the stairs
had been removed and fell eighteen feet to
the ground suffering a back injury.
The union sued Network Rail for making
her work in such an unsafe workplace. The
company claimed that the accident was
principally the member’s fault.
However, prior to a hearing, Network Rail
admitted liability and settled the case for
£50,000.
Her solicitor, David Wilson of RMT
Scottish solicitors Drummond Miller said
that it was a “brilliant result” for a very
tricky case.
“Not only were there significant concerns
on contributory negligence, but the medical
position was extremely complex.
“Luckily, the Union was prepared to back
the member to the hilt and obtain specialist
medical evidence from the country's leading
back expert which helped to persuade the
Defenders to put a significant offer on the
table," he said.
He said that the case is a good example
that not all claims lawyers are the same.
“It is very rare for no win no fee lawyers
to obtain extra medical evidence such as
was obtained in this case.
“Had Mrs F been forced to rely on the
original medical evidence she would have
received an award of less than £10,000,” he
said.
RMT SECURES DAMAGES FOR
NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS
SIGNAL WORKER WINS BACK INJURY COMPENSATION
CAL MAC MEMBER WINS £80,000