Searchable article text
RMTnews :: october 2007 :: www.rmt.org.uk
24
T
his year marks the 40th
anniversary of the 1967
Abortion Act – a piece of
legislation which has saved the
lives and health of hundreds of
thousands of women and to this
day remains fundamental to
women’s autonomy, equality
and freedom.
However, as we celebrate 40
years of safe, legal abortion in
Britain the issue continues to be
surrounded by a veil of secrecy
and misinformation and myths
on abortion abound.
Abortion, we are told, is
available on request. This is not
so - women need the agreement
of two doctors before they can
access the procedure and many
face delays of up to six weeks.
But it is the 24-week time
limit that continues to dominate
the debate on abortion. The
publication three years ago of 4
D-scan pictures of fetuses in the
womb sparked off a heated
media debate about the later
abortion driven by the anti-
choice lobby in the hope of
gaining support for a reduction
of the time limit.
In reality, almost 90 per cent
of abortions are carried out at
under-13 weeks gestation whilst
only a tiny proportion – less
that one per cent – take place
after 22 weeks. The women who
need to access later abortion do
so for compelling, exceptional
and complex reasons.
Gradually media
misinformation and hysteria has
found its way to Westminster.
Over the last few months we
have witnessed several attempts
by anti-choice MPs to raise to
profile of the issue in
parliament.
October 2006 saw the defeat
(187 – 108 votes) of ‘Abortion
time limit and delay’ Bill, which
aimed to reduce the abortion
time limit from 24 to 21 weeks
and introduce a 10-day ‘cooling
off period’.
The ‘Parental notification’
Bill introduced in March 2007
which sought to end
confidentiality for young
women seeking abortion and
other sexual health care was
also sunk (159 – 87 votes), as
was the ‘Compulsory
counselling and delay’ Bill (182
– 107 votes).
But the assault goes on. In
May, the anti-choice lobby
signalled its plans to launch the
strongest attack on women’s
legal rights since 1990 by
proposing amendments to the
government’s Human Tissue and
Embryos (HTE) Bill. These must
face strong opposition.
CAMPAIGN
Abortion Rights has launched its
‘pro-choice majority’ campaign
calling for:
• Women, not doctors, to make
the abortion decision
• An end to waiting times of
longer than three weeks
• An end to attacks on current
rights, including the upper
time limit
40 years since abortion was
legalised, it is time for a law
that trusts women to make their
own decision about whether or
not to continue a pregnancy.
Or in the words of Lord
David Steel, architect of the
1967 Act: ‘‘With the expectation
that legislation on abortion will
again be raised in the next
session of parliament, it is
essential that we use the
opportunity not only to resist
regressive amendments but to
make it easier for women who
need to obtain terminations to
do so as early as possible in
their pregnancies’.
The time has come to move
forward on women’s rights –
not back.
Take action to protect
women’s crucial abortion rights!
• Affiliate your branch or
region to Abortion Rights –
together we are stronger!
• Join as an individual member
• Sign up to Abortion Rights’
Action Alerts:
www.abortionrights.org.uk
• Add your voice to the pro-
choice majority:
www.prochoicemajority.org.uk
• Get involved in the Pro-
Choice Week of Action 20 -
27 October
CELEBRATING 40 YEARS OF SAFE,
LEGAL ABORTION IN BRITAIN