Searchable article text
www.rmt.org.uk :: august/september 2007 :: RMTnews
7
R
MT groundstaff at the Knuckle Yard
EWS depot near the Corus steelworks at
Margam in south Wales took solid 24-hour
strike action in a dispute over "absurd and
highly dangerous" moves to make half of
them redundant.
Engineering staff at the depot have also
voted for industrial action over the
cost-cutting redundancy plan, under which
arduous and dangerous shunting of heavy
steel-wagons is to be imposed on them.
EWS is reportedly on the verge of being
bought out by the German state-owned
Deutsche Bahn for about £300 million.
An EWS spokesman admitted there were
to be redundancies at the depot, but said
they were necessary so the firm could
remain competitive.
But EWS' claims that the union strike
ballot was flawed were dismissed by RMT
General Secretary, Bob Crow who confirmed
that RMT has complied fully with the
relevant legislation.
RMT is taking legal advice over the
company’s supposed criteria for selecting
people for sacking, which included levels of
sick-leave, despite the fact that EWS
management at Margam are well aware that
there is a high level of absence due to
injuries sustained at work.
Selection benchmarks that include
'dynamism' are almost certainly unlawful
and RMT has referred their selection policy
to lawyers to mount a legal challenge.
"It is time that EWS sat down with us
and talked seriously about the issues,
including our reps' counter-proposals which
would save jobs and keep our members
safe," Bob said.
"EWS's attitude to all its staff at Margam
is nothing short of a disgrace and our
members are determined that these jobs will
not be lost.
"The company's plan to sack ten
groundstaff is about cutting costs and
maximising profits regardless of the risk,
and no misleading business arguments can
disguise that reality.
"The company intends to force the bulk
of the shunting onto engineering grades
that already have enough demanding work
of their own to do, and they have now
asked to be balloted as well to defend their
safety and conditions,” he said.
R
MT has won the guarantees
it was seeking from
companies covered by the
Transport for London Pension
Fund that no attempt will be
made to undermine the pension
rights of people forced to leave
their jobs through ill-health.
RMT members last month
voted by a 15-to-one margin to
strike against moves that would
affect qualification for ill-health
pensions. As a result the
principal employers have
confirmed that they will not
attempt to alter the existing
arrangements.
Ill-health pensions are
granted to workers in the TfL
fund whose ill-health makes
them unfit to do their particular
job.
Proposed changes would
have meant that anyone capable
of earning an income, regardless
of how small, would probably
not qualify for or retain an ill-
health pension.
“Our members showed with a
massive majority that they were
prepared to strike to defend
their hard-won ill-health
pension rights, and they have
won a significant victory,” RMT
general secretary Bob Crow said.
“We still believe that the
fund rule that allows annual
review of ill-health pensions
should be scrapped, but we now
have written confirmation that
it will remain suspended.
“Our members have shown
once more that collective
strength can successfully defend
pension rights when they come
under attack,” he said.
At present if medical
evidence indicates that a
member is unfit to do his or her
own job, an ill-health pension
would be granted.
Under the abandoned
proposals ill-health pensions
would have been split into two
parts: a basic pension and an
additional ill-health supplement.
Crucially, the test for
receiving an ill-health pension
would have been changed to an
‘all-work’ test rather than the
current ‘own-job’ test.
This would have left the
majority of those leaving
employment due to ill-health
facing the prospect of their
pension being stopped because
they would not be totally
incapacitated.
EWS STAFF STRIKE AGAINST JOB CUTS
RMT VICTORY ON TFL PENSIONS