Searchable article text
December 1 2006 saw the
publication of the long-awaited
Eddington report which was
commissioned in the 2005
Budget in order to advise
government on the links
between transport and economic
growth, productivity and
environmental sustainability.
Authored by Sir Rod
Eddington, the former chief
executive of British Airways, the
report has failed to seize the
opportunity to recommend the
massive increase in public-
transport capacity our economy
and environment desperately
need.
Despite government
projecting a 30 per cent increase
over the next decade in both
passenger numbers and the
volume of freight tonnes lifted,
rail is some way down
Eddington’s agenda.
In addition, new road
building is not ruled out and,
despite acknowledging that
aviation should meet its social
and environmental costs, the
report argues that there are
significant economic benefits in
expanding the sector.
With the exception of
CrossRail, Eddington makes no
specific recommendations in
relation to new rail
infrastructure projects.
Indeed, the report warns
against being “seduced by grand
projects with speculative
returns”.
Eddington instead
concentrates on upgrading
existing lines and dealing with
pinch points on the network.
Welcome as that is, it is a
serious omission to support the
introduction of road user
charging designed to deal with
congestion and environmental
damage, whilst at the same time
refusing to endorse the
construction of a north-south,
high-speed line. The Institute of
Civil Engineers announced
themselves “dismayed” that the
report had not recognised the
economic and environmental
benefits of such a line.
NEED FOR EXPANSION
RMT provided Eddington with a
detailed submission which
included the case for significant
expansion in the rail and bus
networks to deal with the likely
effect of road user charging, the
development of a high-speed,
north-south rail link and
increasing the modal share of
freight moved by rail and sea
within the wider framework of
an integrated, publicly-owned
transport system.
Commenting on the report,
general secretary Bob Crow said
that it must herald a step
change in transport policy if we
are to meet the climate change
challenge outlined so starkly in
the Stern report.
“Every penny raised by road-
pricing should be spent on
creating the public-transport
network that Britain needs, and
not spent on ever more roads,”
he warned.
He went to argue that
government should back its
commitment to reduce carbon
and other greenhouse gas
emissions with statutory targets
for getting people out of cars
and planes and onto trains,
buses and trams.
www.rmt.org.uk :: january 2007 :: RMTnews
19
EDDINGTON DOESN’T
GO FAR ENOUGH
The long-awaited Eddington
report on the links between
transport and economic
growth, productivity and
environmental sustainability
fails to promote getting people
out of cars and planes and
onto trains, buses and trams