Searchable article text
RMTnews :: july/august 2006 :: www.rmt.org.uk
34
I
t seems ‘the West Lothian
question’ is never out of the
news for long.
The now famous conundrum
posed by Tam Dalyell the former
Labour MP for West Lothian
[hence its name] asks why, in
‘post devolutionary’ Britain,
Scottish MP’s at Westminster
should be able to vote on
English education, health,
housing and transport matters
for example, but English MP’s
have no similar influence over
these issues north of the border?
I must confess whenever I
hear mention of ‘the West
Lothian question’ I can’t help
recall the comedian at the
Edinburgh Festival a couple of
years back who suggested the
real question Dalyell meant to
ask was ‘Who the f*** wants to
live in Bathgate anyway?’
The original, however, has
been posed afresh by Tory MP’s
at Westminster recently whose
clear motive it seems to me is to
unravel the devolution
referendum of 1997.
This strategy contains many
a risk for those keen to hold
onto the ‘United Kingdom’. A
devolved parliament for
Scotland was the least
concession defenders of the
union could offer to hold back
the drive for independence.
It remains to be seen whether
devolution will, in fact ,sate the
desire for independence as
George, now Lord Robertson,
originally forecast, or whether,
in the view of Dalyell himself,
establishing the Holyrood
Parliament meant full blown
independence became inevitable
for Scots.
What is agreed is that behind
the ‘democratic deficit’ which
existed in Scotland for the best
part of 20 years, where Scotland
voted Labour but had a Tory
government foisted on us, lay a
deep and profound sense of
injustice.
Throughout the 1980’s and
1990’s we were governed by a
party with virtually no support
here which treated Scotland like
a test laboratory for all sorts of
hideous experiments, most
notably the poll tax, introduced,
lets not forget, one year before
the rest of the UK.
And the Tories solution now
to the West Lothian question?
That Scottish MP’s should be
banned from participating in
Westminster debates. Defensive
Labour MP’s respond saying it
would mean two different
classes of MP.
For me the question arises
because devolution represents
unfinished business. All
decisions affecting Scotland
should in my view be debated
and decided upon here at
Holyrood, in our national
parliament. Most Scots agree
that had we the power to decide,
then no Scots troops would
currently be fighting in Iraq or
Afghanistan.
Should pro-independence
parties win a majority in next
year’s Holyrood elections we are
all agreed that a referendum
would be held immediately to
decide the issue.
Equally, the more the Tories
look like winning the next
Westminster elections, the
greater the likelihood of a
constitutional crisis.
It seems inevitable that a
conflict would erupt between
governments at Holyrood under
pressure to follow one political
course and Westminster set on
quite another.
As we approach the 300th
anniversary of the highly
unpopular Act of Union when
Scotland and England were first
politically joined together, it is
the national question itself with
all its complexities that may
well dominate the news rather
than the relatively abstract
‘West Lothian’ one.
By Colin Fox MSP
National Convenor, Scottish
Socialist Party
WEST LOTHIAN IS THE NATIONAL QUESTION