Searchable article text
G
erman national railway
company Deutsche Bahn
(DB) has been seeking to acquire
majority stakes in port
companies, moves that have
been met with fierce resistance.
The rail operator even offered
terminal operator Hamburger
Hafen-und Logistik AG to
transfer DB headquarters from
Berlin to Hamburg – a deal
which has so far been rejected.
The rail company has
attempted to take a stake in the
port of Duisburg, Europe’s
largest inland port and a huge
freight transport hub with a
pan-European significance,
particularly for intermodal
transport, maritime containers
and overland transport.
The carrot that DB offered in
this particular case was the
concentration of all of its
freight transport subsidiaries
and divisions in Duisburg (i.e.
Railion, Schenker, DB Logistik,
Stinnes Intermodal und Stinnes
Freight Logistics).
One third of the port of
Duisburg belongs to the town of
Duisburg, another third to the
federal state of North Rhine-
Westphalia and the remainder to
the German state.
Berlin is rumoured to want to
dispose of its one-third share,
but North Rhine-Westphalia and
Duisburg’s plans are not yet
known.
The Bremen-based terminal
operator Eurogate has also been
targeted by DB.
Hartmut Mehdorn, head of
the railway company, cites the
need for access to ports to
complete the transport chain but
Deutsche Bahn does not just
want to take a stake, it wants
the majority – 51 per cent or
nothing.
DB wants to operate ship, rail
and road options in the ports
and handle facilities themselves
– to the disadvantage of all
other port service companies.
Mehdorn has also ruled out
complying with EU rail
directives which demand the
break-up of the company and
the separation of infrastructure
and train operations.
“An integrated railway is
absolutely essential to ensure
continuing technological
development of the wheel/rail
system," he said.
RMTnews :: july/august 2006 :: www.rmt.org.uk
30
Asian Development Bank vice-
president C Lawrence
Greenwood recently addressed
a meeting in Manila warning
that full divestiture
(privatisation) of rail assets may
not be feasible or desirable,
given railway's role as a public
good.
“Even mature economies such
as the United Kingdom have
found full divestiture to have
substantial risks and
unintended negative
consequences,” he said.
British Rail was privatised on
the basis of EU directives
which are now being rolled out
across the European Union.
However, Estonia has recently
partially re-nationalised its rail
network, a move praised by Mr
Greenwood.
“In Estonia, for example, the
government maintained a
minority share in a new railway
company while retaining
regulatory oversight for safety
and monopolistic abuse,” he
said.
A
nglo-French tunnel
operator Eurotunnel has
been holding last ditch talks to
stave off bankruptcy.
The group sought protection
from French courts with the
French equivalent of US
"Chapter 11" bankruptcy
protection, which allows firms
to continue to operate.
If approved by the courts, the
"Procedure de Sauvegarde"
would give Eurotunnel a six-
month window of protection
from creditors while a court-
appointed administrator
restructured the company's
debts.
The company agreed a
preliminary restructuring plan
with its priority lenders and
Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Axa
and Macquarie back in May,
which would see Eurotunnel's
debt cut by more than 50
percent to £2.9 billion.
They have given Eurotunnel
a waiver to allow it to have
talks with a group of
bondholders who have rejected
the deal.
If an agreement is reached,
Eurotunnel has said it will
withdraw its application for
court protection.
But if it fails, Eurotunnel
chief Jacques Gounon has
threatened to put the group into
insolvency.
The bondholders are the
lowest-ranked debt holders, who
would be very unlikely to get
any of their money back if
Eurotunnel is declared insolvent.
They have complained that
they are being offered too little
money to allow the
restructuring to go ahead, and
are seeking a different deal
which would leave them with
cash and shares in the company.
The crisis at Eurotunnel has
its origins in the construction of
the channel tunnel, completed
in 1994 at a cost of about £10
billion.
Traffic has never been nearly
as heavy as was originally
forecast, hitting Eurotunnel's
revenues.
EUROTUNNEL FACES
BANKRUPTCY
ASIAN BANKER WARNS
AGAINST RAIL PRIVATISATION
DEUTSCHE BAHN SEEKING PORTS
INTERNATIONAL NEWS
BANKRUPT?: Eurotunnel workers’ demonstrating outside last year’s annual meeting in
Coquelles, northern France. Placards read "Our Lives Are Not For Sale", left, and "No to
the Death of Employment".