Searchable article text
may 2005 :: RMTnews
17
FOR MANY years railways and
tramways operated happily side
by side. However, in the middle
of the last century, tramways in
our towns and cities were
dismantled, with only the
Blackpool tramway remaining.
That was until a new
generation of tramways came
along with names like
Supertram, Tramlink and
Metrolink. In greater
Manchester, Metrolink won
widespread support and a
campaign was launched for the
system to be expanded.
Part of this ‘phase three’
expansion takes in the heavy
rail route known as the Oldham
loop, running from Manchester
to Rochdale. This route forms
the bulk of work at Manchester
Victoria depot as well as Wigan
Wallgate.
It is true that the route is in
need of investment. But that can
be said for whole swathes of the
rail network. Moreover, a lot of
the problems on the Oldham
loop come about as a direct
result of the uncertainty
surrounding the route.
Now, no RMT member is
going to argue against more
public transport. However,
converting the Oldham loop to
light rail would not provide
additional public transport. It
would simply replace one mode
of transport with another.
Furthermore, an objective look
at the options available reveals
that there are few benefits for
conversion.
In fact, less money would be
better spent on improving
existing rail infrastructure,
rather than wasting millions on
chucking trains off the loop and
replacing them with trams.
Metrolink is essentially two
very good former rail routes
with a bit of on-street running
linking the two. The Bury and
Altrincham lines were regarded
as good paying routes, with
trains regularly full of
passengers. Both were snatched
from British Rail in 1989 and
turned into the separate
privatised edifice called
Metrolink.
Since then, very little has
been spent on infrastructure and
the system is showing signs of
age. It is estimated that it will
cost around £100 million to
bring the infrastructure back to
1990 standards. This is money
they have not got, yet they want
to take more railway.
The powers that be are
desperate for the expanded
route. In 2002, when the closure
of the Oldham Loop was
granted, a document supporting
conversion claimed that journey
times on trams would be far
quicker than trains and there
was far more capacity.
However, these figures were
somewhat distorted.
The rail capacity comparison
was only for a single 142 set
and did not consider the 130 per
cent figure of seating capacity, a
figure that is routinely broken.
The tram capacity figure was
for a seating and standing
capacity of four persons per
square metre of floor space. This
translates to 25 square
centimetres per passenger,
probably less as the seats are
larger.
Despite these distorted
figures, the money needed to
build the extensions has not
been forthcoming and there is a
local campaign called ‘Get our
Metrolink back on track’.
The company even re-liveried
one of the trams with a huge
logo carrying this message.
Ironically, that tram derailed in
the city centre on old and
shoddy ‘phase one’ track.
With a closure order granted
on the Oldham Loop, the route
is living on borrowed time.
A pre-Metrolink timetable of
only two trains an hour from
Victoria to Rochdale, stopping at
all stations, has led to passenger
numbers dropping like stone.
The service is due to revert to
the faster four trains per hour in
each direction when the summer
timetable comes into force, with
through trains to Wigan and
Merseyside also returning.
Hopefully, passengers will
return as well but how long will
the service remain?
What is clearly required is an
end to the uncertainty once and
for all and for the closure order
to be repealed. The Oldham Loop
could become part of an
integrated transport network
which utilises the present
infrastructure and provides a
decent rail service.
Train crew conference delegate Alex Holden
outlines the case against handing the Oldham loop
line over to tram privateers
SAVE THE
OLDHAM
LOOP RAIL
ROUTE!