Searchable article text
RMTnews :: may 2005
12
DELEGATES agreed that the
union should campaign for a
“comprehensive and
meaningful” collective
bargaining machinery for grades
covered by conference,
including those still outside
Network Rail.
Steve Smart, March and
District said that harmonising
the myriad of different pay rates
and conditions would be a long
and difficult task, but it had to
be done.
“In Network Rail we are
looking at a clean sheet of paper
on which to create a system for
the betterment of all,” he said.
Mark Farrington,
Warrington District warned that
the use of ‘role clarity’ could be
used to “blur grades” and
undermine conditions.
“We need to protect grade
structures in this process and
stop management abandoning
competency levels,” he said.
John Boyle, Wishaw and
Motherwell said that those
private companies not brought
back in-house under Network
Rail were ignoring procedures
and making people redundant.
“We need one standard
across the industry ensure the
protection of jobs, pay,
conditions and the health and
safety of all our infrastructure
members,” he said.
Bill Rawcliffe, York and
District reminded conference
that being brought back in-
house was not a cure-all.
“Network Rail is not British
Rail, it is driven by cost and
profit,” he said.
Danny McNicol, East
Midlands warned that the sort
of harmonisation required would
“come to nothing” if PT&R
arrangements were not protected
and abuses investigated
thoroughly by the union.
Conference resolved to
convene a special two-day
conference at the earliest
opportunity.
DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING
Drug and alcohol testing
methods should be reviewed and
those tested should not be kept
beyond their normal hours of
work, conference agreed.
Steve Wallace, Fort William
said he had been held for hours
after work for a drug and
alcohol test.
“This is false imprisonment
and constituents a breach of
human rights,” he said.
Doug Hammersley, Signal,
Electrical and Track London
Underground said that the
computers being used to pick
out staff for testing were very
impressive as very often they
chose RMT reps.
Dave Hobbs, Newport said
that testing was being carried
out by “shoddy” contract firms
and that there was clearly a
need to inform members what
their rights are.
Assistant general secretary
Mick Cash said that increasingly
Network Rail was bringing in
random screening.
“This is being done without
consultation with the union and
the consensus on the issue is
breaking down,” he said.
Greg Hewitt, Brighton
reported that staff were being
forced to give urine samples on
the track without “dignity of
privacy”.
Willie Devlin, SET London
Underground said it was
necessary to find out what was
going on in each area in order
to establish national standards.
“In LUL we had the case of
the Farringdon Five where staff
were found to be negative and
were still sacked” he said.
Barry West, Cornwall Mid
West reminded conference that
Network Rail’s own code stated
what drugs rendered workers
unfit for work under rule 3.2
and this imformation should be
more widely distributed.
IMPLEMENT WELFARE RULES
Conference agreed that it was
time that Health and Safety
Executive (HSE)
recommendations for provision
of welfare facilities at
infrastructure maintenance and
renewal sites.
Brendan Kelly, Bristol Rail
said that some contractors
ignore health and safety
recommendations for welfare
facilities for transient workers.
These facilities include
adequate washing, toilet, rest
and changing facilities and
somewhere clean to eat and
drink during breaks.
“Now many people have been
transferred over to Network Rail
it is time for a new start and
start spending some profits on
decent facilities for the
workforce.
“If we are still discussing
this issue next year with no
improvements we will have
failed as a union,” he warned.
Gerry McCann, Ayr added
that many female workers were
coming into the industry,
making it even more important
“to get this sorted out once and
for all”.
Peter Trend, reporting for
the Council of Executives, said
that the union had made
representations to Network Rail
over the issue and the union’s
Towards national
Engineering grades meeting in Sheffield
agreed to convene a special two-day
conference to discuss the need for national
collective bargaining