Searchable article text
june 2005 :: RMTnews
9
R
ail privatisation has been an
unmitigated disaster, driven simply by
dogma and the determination to force
public assets into private hands to reverse
the democratic advances of the 20th
century.
It has been justified by irrational
gobbledegook, such as the supposed
need to ‘lever in private investment’ and to
keep borrowing “off balance sheet”, when
public borrowing for public investment is
massively cheaper and easier to raise. The
reality is that privatisation has been used
to pour billions of pounds of public money
into deep corporate pockets with no public
benefit whatsoever.
The numbers are mind-boggling. In the ten
years after privatisation, estimated public
subsidy per passenger journey rose by five
times.
The cost of laying a mile of railway line has
risen by an estimated four times and
maintenance costs undertaken by private
contractors multiplied by three and half
times.
All sorts of scams have been used by
private companies to rake off as much
money as possible, either directly from the
public purse or indirectly from passengers
through high fares.
Rail staff kept the show on the road - or
the track - but the privateers have been
laughing all the way to the bank.
One technique has been for the networks
of interlocking companies to hire staff to
each other at vastly inflated costs. Another
has been to undertake engineering work
precisely to specification, even when the
specification is wrong. Work then has to be
done all over again, with more cash for
company coffers.
By contrast, BR engineers worked within
strict cash limits and used every ounce of
skill to get the best job done within those
cash limits. They made adjustments to
ensure everything worked properly when
the job was finished, as the former Rail
Regulator put it only two years ago: “BR
worked miracles on a pittance”.
The recent Catalyst report revealed that,
while British Rail was under-funded for
decades, it was remarkably efficient with a
high level of productivity. The Regulator
confirmed that when privatised, the
railways were handed over by BR “in good
order”.
Another technique used by the privateers
is simply over-charge for a job. If a new
bridge should cost £3 million, they pump
up the costs to perhaps £12 million and, of
course, keep former BR engineers away
from the job so their scandalous over-
charging is not exposed.
Indeed, engineering work on Britain’s
privatised railways has frequently been
managed by people who know nothing
about railway engineering. In one case a
former plumber managed maintenance
contracts. In another case, a senior
manager was allegedly a former night club
bouncer with no engineering skills or
qualifications at all. Their job was simply to
maximise profit, easily done with
governments committed to privatisation
and therefore simply prepared to sign the
cheques rather than to renationalise.
To be fair, former Minister Stephen Byers
established Network Rail as a not-for-profit
company to take over from Railtrack.
Since then Network Rail has made
significant improvements, taking
maintenance contracts in-house and
reducing costs. But Stephen was told very
firmly by Downing St that there must be no
renationalisation.
When the South Eastern Trains franchise
was taken in house, costs fell and service
quality improved. But government could
not allow public enterprise to be seen to
be working better than private enterprise,
so the franchise is being forced back into
the private sector.
And what about the rolling-ºstock
companies (roscos)? They lease rolling
stock to the train operating companies at
staggering rates of return, typically 30 per
cent. This is for rolling stock which has a
useful life of around 20 years. Imagine a
speculator building a house at a cost of
£160,000, then charging a rent of £1,000 a
week as a monopoly supplier with no
competition. Small wonder that the three
banks that own the roscos have raked in
obscene profits.
The case for renationalisation is
overwhelming. It would save the Treasury
billions of pounds and provide a better,
cheaper and more efficient service for
passengers and freight.
The railways have the benefit dedicated
staff who love the railway – a precious
resource for the country and the economy.
The loyalty of rail workers should be used
to serve the public interest and not to
make profits for the privateers.
Kelvin Hopkins
MP for Luton North
Parliamentary column
R
MT’s Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual Members’
Advisory Committee have been busy making
plans to attend Pride Events this summer.
Pride in Brighton & Hove will take place on
Saturday, August 6 and the committee will be
representing RMT. The Battle Bus will be in
Preston Park, Brighton.
If anyone is interested in joining other
members of the Committee in the march and rally,
please contact the Equal Opportunities Officer on
020 7529 8821 or email p.wilkinson@rmt.org.uk
The London Pride festival fortnight takes place
between June 18 - July 1 2005 and there will be
theatre, opera, dance, music, film, visual arts and
sport.
For those who want more details of events,
visit the Pride website at www.pridelondon.org.
TAKE PRIDE
THE CASE FOR RAIL
NATIONALISATION
Rise
and shine
R
MT will be participating in the Rise
anti-racist Festival. Rise is the new
name for Respect, Europe’s largest anti-
racist festival for the past five years. This is
an excellent opportunity to celebrate the
rich diversity of our society whilst
combining a stand against racism with first-
rate entertainment.
This year's festival will take place on
Saturday, July 16 in Burgess Park, south
London, starting at midday until 8.30 pm.
Members of the RMT Black & Ethnic
Minority Members’ Committee will be
present, along with the RMT Battle Bus.
There will be something of interest for
everyone, ranging from music (with acts
such as Lemar, The Mitchell Brothers and
Horace Andy to name but a few), comedy,
Big Cuba Fiesta Area, Extreme Sports Zone
(with BMX and skateboarding displays,
sports training, etc), family area, and much
more.