Searchable article text
RMT news – Health and safety
T
RACK worker deaths have been rising
steadily since 1995, averaging from
around one every 170 days to one
every 80 days by the end of 2004,
Birmingham Engineering delegate Pat
Collins told the one hundred-strong health
and safety conference.
Pat pointed out that in the past track
deaths were associated with being struck
by a train while working on a line open to
traffic, but now the majority of serious
accidents have occurred within engineering
possessions.
“Eight track workers killed within
possessions during 2004, including the four
at Tebay, represents the highest number of
deaths since 1990/91,” he said.
During the same period the number of
major injuries had also risen over the last
thirty years from one every six days to one
every four days, he said.
“Trackside workers now represent one of
the highest risk occupations in the country,
exceeding building and agricultural
industries,” he said.
Delegates heard that in many accidents
enquiries had found that there had been
serious deficiencies in the planning process,
the use of plant and the management of
work.
Conference agreed that safety rules had
not kept pace with new systems of working
and called on the union to press Network
Rail for an urgent and fundamental review of
the planning processes, use of plant and
management of work within such
possessions in order to ensure safe
systems of work.
Level crossing safety
Conference called for a full review of safety
at level crossings following the recent
incidents, including the deadly Ufton Nervet
rail crash.
The union should look at options such as
replacing crossings with underpasses or
bridges, or ensure that they are barriered or
staffed 24 hours a day or at least staffed
during train service hours.
Holyhead delegate Jack Jones said that
level crossings were the number one risk on
the railways.
“Staff are often disciplined for trying to
prevent accidents and in many incidences
the CCTV monitors are of poor, black and
white quality.
“These issues have to be taclked as a
matter of urgency,” he said.
Exeter delegate Bob Miles had attended
the funeral of victims of the Ufton Nervet
disaster and said that the refusal to act to
make crossings safer was simply a question
of “putting money before safety”.
Delegates agreed that there should be a
CCTV-recorded link so that following any
incidents an independent record can be
viewed by the police, HSE or other investi-
gating bodies.
Isocyanate paints
Toxic paints that attack the respiratory
system were being used on P&O vessels in
contravention of Fleet Regulations Dover
Shipping Branch delegate Tim May told
conference.
He said that P&O fleet regulations clearly
stated that only Isocyanate-free paints
should be used. However, management
now contended that the regulation was
incorrectly worded and intended to amend
them.
“How can it be that regulations banning
Putting track safety first
The packed third annual RMT Health and Safety
conference called on the union to fight for a
fundamental review of rail track safety following the
deaths of eight track workers in the past year
14
RMT news – Health and safety
the use of these paints can be removed in
such a casual manner, he added.
“This stuff gets into the ventilation system
and the smell stays in the air for weeks,” he
said.
Conference called for independent
analysis of these products which should
include not only the chemical formula of the
paint and additives, but also the full range
of potential physical problems that may be
caused by their continued use.
Shipboard equipment
Conference heard serious concerns
regarding the suitability of firefighting suits
on board Northlink and other ferries.
Aberdeen and Glasgow shipping branches
submitted unanimously supported motions
that such suits may jeopardise the safety of
seafarers in the event of a fire on board ship
or other installation due to the materials
used and their construction.
The union was called upon to seek
guidance from the relevant regulatory
organisations as to the designated use of
this type of suit and the approved interna-
tional standard to which they comply.
Assaults on staff
Attacks on rail staff were on the increase,
Warrington and District delegate Daivd
Wilson told conference.
He said that Network Rail had produced a
poster in conjunction with the British
Transport Police and the rail companies
claiming that assaults would not be
tolerated and that staff will be given total
support in any prosecution.
“However, the reality is that we get little or
no support from the police or private
security firms employed by the railway
companies.
“Police response times are terrible as they
only seem to bother policing the large
mainline stations, to the detriment of our
vulnerable members on out-stations who
mostly work on their own from the early
hours to midnight,” he said.
Conference agreed that members should
feel safe when they report for duty in the
knowledge that if they need assistance, a
response by the police or the security firm
would be forthcoming.
Delegates agreed that the police had lost
touch with their duties, with budgets and
overtime outweighing duties, and security
firms only seemed to be bothered with
collecting revenue for the rail companies
instead of making the railways safer.
The union was asked to seek clarification
from the various rail companies and BTP on
what their policies are for police and
security firm patrols at out-stations that are
operated by lone workers.
Assistant general secretary Mick Cash
suggested that the newly elected health and
safety liaison committee made up of Jack
Jones, Glen Wallis and Brendan Kelly meet
with the BTP to discuss the issues raised by
conference.
G Conference elected Jack Jones as the
chair of next year’s health and safety
conference and he will chair proceedings.
THE most effective tool to ensure
good health and safety at work is
trade unions, because organised
workplaces are safer workplaces,
TUC head of safety Hugh Robertson
told conference.
He said that was one of the main
reasons that people join and stay in a
union: 70 per cent of new trade union
members considered health and
safety a “very important” union issue
– more even than for pay.
“A recent study showed that where
there is a union presence the
workplace injury rate is 24 per cent
lower than where there is no union
presence,” he said.
John Milligan of the RMT
organising unit agreed that effective
workplace organisation was the key
to health and safety.
“We need to build the confidence of
workers to ensure that members are
not isolated in order to challenge
employers and ensure a safe working
environment,” he said.
Hugh Robertson agreed and said
that the positive impact of union
activity also lowered ill-health levels.
Another study by Cambridge
University’s Judge Institute of
Management found: “The proportion
of employees who are trade union
members has a positive and
significant association on both injury
and illness rates”.
In 2003 the Health and Safety
Executive (HSE) ran a number of
pilots where trade union appointed
“Worker Safety Advisers” went in to
non-unionised organisations.
An HSE evaluation reported that
over 75 per cent of employers said
they had made changes as a result
and almost 70 per cent of workers
had seen an increase in awareness of
health and safety (Hazards 84).
“One of the reasons unions make
such a difference is that they ensure
that their safety representatives are
trained.
“And safety representatives know
the workplace far better than
management as they are aware of
what really goes on. They also act as
a channel for individual workers to
raise their concerns,” said Hugh.
Many risks were first identified by
unions, sometimes after management
ignored or hid early warnings.
It was unions that highlighted the
dangers of asbestos, carbon
disulphide and vinyl chloride
monomer. Unions were the first to
raise major concerns over levels
of violence in the workplace, and
RSI, and the effects of passive
smoking.
When delegates pointed out that
employers were sometime refusing to
release health and safety reps to
attend training courses, Hugh said
that the law required them to do so
and those reps affected should
contact the union.
Safety reps make a difference
15